From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jani Nikula Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] Revert "drm/i915/edp: Allow alternate fixed mode for eDP if available." Date: Tue, 22 May 2018 12:44:16 +0300 Message-ID: <87d0xovxcf.fsf@intel.com> References: <20180516080110.22770-1-jani.nikula@intel.com> <1526513406.17473.162.camel@intel.com> <87y3gizr48.fsf@intel.com> <87po1uzqh5.fsf@intel.com> <1526586282.17473.177.camel@intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1526586282.17473.177.camel@intel.com> Sender: stable-owner@vger.kernel.org To: dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org Cc: Paulo Zanoni , "# v4 . 14+" , Rodrigo Vivi List-Id: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org On Thu, 17 May 2018, Dhinakaran Pandiyan wrote: > Yeah, agreed on starting with a clean slate. > > The offending commit claims alternate mode was intended to be used for > PSR testing. I don't see any psr_basic failures in BAT or any other PSR > sub-tests failing on shards, must have been a non-CI machine then. > > The revert itself looks correct, > Reviewed-by: Dhinakaran Pandiyan Thanks for the review, pushed to dinq. BR, Jani. -- Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center