From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mga01.intel.com ([192.55.52.88]:3323 "EHLO mga01.intel.com"
        rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
        id S932418AbeCMRUe (ORCPT <rfc822;netdev@vger.kernel.org>);
        Tue, 13 Mar 2018 13:20:34 -0400
From: Vinicius Costa Gomes <vinicius.gomes@intel.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: randy.e.witt@intel.com, davem@davemloft.net
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v0 2/2] skbuff: Notify errors with sk_error_report()
In-Reply-To: <ee7a00a6-a2ce-ea0b-005f-eb3c46efdcd4@gmail.com>
References: <20180312231052.13961-1-vinicius.gomes@intel.com> <20180312231052.13961-3-vinicius.gomes@intel.com> <ee7a00a6-a2ce-ea0b-005f-eb3c46efdcd4@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2018 10:20:33 -0700
Message-ID: <87d107yjry.fsf@intel.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <netdev.vger.kernel.org>

Hi

Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com> writes:

> On 03/12/2018 04:10 PM, Vinicius Costa Gomes wrote:
>> When errors are enqueued to the error queue via sock_queue_err_skb()
>> function, it is possible that the correct application is not notified.
>
> Your patch makes sense, thanks.

Cool. Will send a non-RFC version then.

Would the changes to txtimestamp selftest be helpful?


Cheers,
--
Vinicius