From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from out03.mta.xmission.com ([166.70.13.233]:54296 "EHLO out03.mta.xmission.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751266AbdDFRvz (ORCPT ); Thu, 6 Apr 2017 13:51:55 -0400 From: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman) To: Amir Goldstein Cc: Miklos Szeredi , Omar Sandoval , linux-fsdevel , Al Viro , Jeff Layton References: <20170112175641.GA9783@vader.DHCP.thefacebook.com> Date: Thu, 06 Apr 2017 12:46:26 -0500 In-Reply-To: (Amir Goldstein's message of "Thu, 6 Apr 2017 13:56:59 +0300") Message-ID: <87d1cp8m4t.fsf@xmission.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Subject: Re: [LSF/MM TOPIC] new mount(2) userspace api Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Amir Goldstein writes: > On Fri, Jan 27, 2017 at 11:46 AM, Miklos Szeredi wrote: >> On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 3:20 PM, Miklos Szeredi wrote: >>> On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 6:56 PM, Omar Sandoval wrote: >>>> On Wed, Jan 11, 2017 at 11:37:03AM +0100, Miklos Szeredi wrote: >>>>> General direction has been laid out by Al, but it would be good to >>>>> discuss the details. >>>>> >>>>> I plan to work on this after overlayfs is "done". >>>>> >>>>> Thanks, >>>>> Miklos >>>> >>>> Hi, Miklos, >>>> >>>> What's the background on this? Is there a mailing list thread? >>> >>> http://marc.info/?t=138677271200004&r=1&w=2 >>> >>> https://lwn.net/Articles/609376/ >> >> Found one more: >> >> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/ksummit-discuss/2014-August/001199.html > > > Miklos, > > WRT the suggestion to use a netlink socket that was made in LSF, be aware that > netlink sockets are per network-ns and mounts as you know are per mount-ns. > That may be a problem when setting up a mount from non root network-ns > or maybe not? - I am not sure. Netlink TLV's may be used over an ordinary file descriptor and that seems much more reasonable that netlink if the netlink style of marshalling arguments is desired. Eric