From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
To: "Lee, Shawn C" <shawn.c.lee@intel.com>, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: Cooper Chiou <cooper.chiou@intel.com>,
Wei Shun Chen <wei.shun.chang@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/i915/dp: Read link status more times when EQ not done
Date: Thu, 02 Feb 2017 13:05:46 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87d1f0zwc5.fsf@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1486031230-4914-1-git-send-email-shawn.c.lee@intel.com>
On Thu, 02 Feb 2017, "Lee, Shawn C" <shawn.c.lee@intel.com> wrote:
> From: "Lee, Shawn C" <shawn.c.lee@intel.com>
>
> When user space link status, display driver read DPCD register
> 0x202, 0x203 and 0x204 to identify sink status. When PSR exit
> is ongoing before EQ done. Panel will report EQ & symbol lock
> not done. Both of them are under progressing at the same time
> to cause this issue.
>
> This WA try to read link status more times if EQ not done.
> Panel spec request at least 1000us for fast link train when
> PSR exit. So driver will wait 1000us~1500us then retrieve
> sink link status again.
I'm not sure about the patch, but no matter what it needs to be rebased
on top of current drm-tip to even be considered.
If you're working around a specific eDP PSR issue, why do this on *all*
DP?
BR,
Jani.
>
> Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=99639
> TEST=Reboot DUT and no flicking on local display at login screen
>
> Cc: Cooper Chiou <cooper.chiou@intel.com>
> Cc: Wei Shun Chen <wei.shun.chang@intel.com>
> Cc: Gary C Wang <gary.c.wang@intel.com>
> Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
>
> Signed-off-by: Lee, Shawn C <shawn.c.lee@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c | 33 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
> 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
> index e80d620846c8..a9a6ce476438 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
> @@ -4136,13 +4136,36 @@ static void intel_dp_handle_test_request(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
> return;
>
> /* if link training is requested we should perform it always */
> - if ((intel_dp->compliance.test_type == DP_TEST_LINK_TRAINING) ||
> - (!drm_dp_channel_eq_ok(link_status, intel_dp->lane_count))) {
> - DRM_DEBUG_KMS("%s: channel EQ not ok, retraining\n",
> - intel_encoder->base.name);
> + if (intel_dp->compliance.test_type == DP_TEST_LINK_TRAINING) {
> + DRM_DEBUG_KMS("%s: compliance test mode, retraining\n",
> + intel_encoder->base.name);
> + } else {
> + u8 retry;
> +
> + for (retry = 0; retry < 3; retry++) {
> + if (!drm_dp_channel_eq_ok(link_status, intel_dp->lane_count)) {
> + /*
> + * EQ not ok may caused by fast link train while exit PSR active,
> + * wait at least 1000 us then read it again.
> + */
> + DRM_DEBUG_KMS("%s: channel EQ not ok, retry = %d, DPCD 0x202 = 0x%x, 0x203 = 0x%x, 0x204 = 0x%x\n",
> + intel_encoder->base.name, retry, link_status[0], link_status[1], link_status[2]);
> + usleep_range(1000, 1500);
> + if (!intel_dp_get_link_status(intel_dp, link_status)) {
> + DRM_ERROR("Failed to get link status\n");
> + return;
> + }
> + } else {
> + /* channel EQ is fine */
> + return;
> + }
> + }
>
> - intel_dp_retrain_link(intel_dp);
> + DRM_DEBUG_KMS("%s: channel EQ not ok, retraining\n",
> + intel_encoder->base.name);
> }
> +
> + intel_dp_retrain_link(intel_dp);
> }
>
> /*
--
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Technology Center
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-02-02 11:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-02-02 10:27 [PATCH] drm/i915/dp: Read link status more times when EQ not done Lee, Shawn C
2017-02-02 11:05 ` Jani Nikula [this message]
2017-03-02 8:30 ` Lee, Shawn C
2017-03-02 8:36 ` [PATCH v2] " Lee, Shawn C
2017-03-07 20:00 ` Jani Nikula
2017-03-13 8:12 ` [PATCH v3] " Lee, Shawn C
2017-03-31 23:25 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2017-04-03 21:57 ` Jim Bride
2017-04-25 10:09 ` [PATCH v4] drm/i915/edp: " Lee, Shawn C
2017-03-02 9:18 ` ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: warning for drm/i915/dp: Read link status more times when EQ not done (rev3) Patchwork
2017-03-13 8:17 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for drm/i915/dp: Read link status more times when EQ not done (rev4) Patchwork
2017-04-25 9:58 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for drm/i915/dp: Read link status more times when EQ not done (rev5) Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87d1f0zwc5.fsf@intel.com \
--to=jani.nikula@intel.com \
--cc=cooper.chiou@intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=shawn.c.lee@intel.com \
--cc=wei.shun.chang@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.