From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:36147)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <quintela@redhat.com>) id 1c2eI4-0006nn-Eu
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 04 Nov 2016 09:12:22 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <quintela@redhat.com>) id 1c2eI0-0008V6-LX
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 04 Nov 2016 09:12:16 -0400
From: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
In-Reply-To: <b41721a8-c3df-871d-f487-13841ab9ede8@openvz.org> (Denis
	V. Lunev's message of "Wed, 2 Nov 2016 15:05:39 +0300")
References: <1471343175-14945-1-git-send-email-vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
	<d69ac048-0155-26a0-789d-18ee5a116f3d@virtuozzo.com>
	<20161102111332.GC4693@stefanha-x1.localdomain>
	<b41721a8-c3df-871d-f487-13841ab9ede8@openvz.org>
Reply-To: quintela@redhat.com
Date: Fri, 04 Nov 2016 14:12:04 +0100
Message-ID: <87d1ibo0d7.fsf@emacs.mitica>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] ping Re: [PATCH 00/18] Dirty bitmaps postcopy
 migration
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: "Denis V. Lunev" <den@openvz.org>
Cc: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, qemu-block@nongnu.org, pbonzini@redhat.com, armbru@redhat.com, eblake@redhat.com, famz@redhat.com, amit.shah@redhat.com, mreitz@redhat.com, kwolf@redhat.com, peter.maydell@linaro.org, dgilbert@redhat.com, jsnow@redhat.com, lirans@il.ibm.com

"Denis V. Lunev" <den@openvz.org> wrote:
> On 11/02/2016 02:13 PM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
>> On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 04:04:35PM +0300, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
>>> ping
>>>
>>> For now there are some notes mostly about accessory patches. What about
>>> migration itself? Is it ok? Has it a chance of being merged one day?
>> This series mostly touches migration/ code.  Juan or DaveG?
> yep. this is the problem :(
>
> or they can just accept ;)

I just commented on almost all the migration bits of the patches (and
noticed that fam/john snow commented on almost all the block ones).

Later, Juan.