From: krisman@linux.vnet.ibm.com (Gabriel Krisman Bertazi)
Subject: Oops when completing request on the wrong queue
Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2016 15:10:35 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87d1lfrxb8.fsf@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160811171655.GA5334@localhost.localdomain> (Keith Busch's message of "Thu, 11 Aug 2016 13:16:55 -0400")
Keith Busch <keith.busch at intel.com> writes:
> On Wed, Aug 10, 2016@01:04:35AM -0300, Gabriel Krisman Bertazi wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> We, IBM, have been experiencing eventual Oops when stressing IO at the
>> same time we add/remove processors. The Oops happens in the IRQ path,
>> when we try to complete a request that was apparently meant for another
>> queue.
>>
>> In __nvme_process_cq, the driver will use the cqe.command_id and the
>> nvmeq->tags to find out, via blk_mq_tag_to_rq, the request that
>> initiated the IO. Eventually, it happens that the request returned by
>> that function is not initialized, and we crash inside
>> __blk_mq_complete_request, as shown below.
>
> Could you try the following patch and see if it resolves the issue?
Hi Keith,
Thanks for your response. I had tried this exact change already on 4.7
with no effect. Do you think doing it on 4.8-rc1 will yield better
results?
I also verified that the iod, when in __nvme_process_cq, points to the same
queue that queued the command, as expected, but in nvme_timeout,
according to the log I sent earlier, it is pointing to a different nvmeq
(different nvmeq->qid). This is very strange to me.
--
Gabriel Krisman Bertazi
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-08-11 18:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-08-10 4:04 Oops when completing request on the wrong queue Gabriel Krisman Bertazi
2016-08-11 17:16 ` Keith Busch
2016-08-11 18:10 ` Gabriel Krisman Bertazi [this message]
2016-08-19 13:28 ` Gabriel Krisman Bertazi
2016-08-19 13:28 ` Gabriel Krisman Bertazi
2016-08-19 14:13 ` Jens Axboe
2016-08-19 14:13 ` Jens Axboe
2016-08-19 15:51 ` Jens Axboe
2016-08-19 15:51 ` Jens Axboe
2016-08-19 16:38 ` Gabriel Krisman Bertazi
2016-08-19 16:38 ` Gabriel Krisman Bertazi
2016-08-23 20:54 ` Gabriel Krisman Bertazi
2016-08-23 20:54 ` Gabriel Krisman Bertazi
2016-08-23 21:11 ` Jens Axboe
2016-08-23 21:11 ` Jens Axboe
2016-08-23 21:14 ` Jens Axboe
2016-08-23 21:14 ` Jens Axboe
2016-08-23 22:49 ` Keith Busch
2016-08-23 22:49 ` Keith Busch
2016-08-24 18:34 ` Jens Axboe
2016-08-24 18:34 ` Jens Axboe
2016-08-24 20:36 ` Jens Axboe
2016-08-24 20:36 ` Jens Axboe
2016-08-29 18:06 ` Gabriel Krisman Bertazi
2016-08-29 18:06 ` Gabriel Krisman Bertazi
2016-08-29 18:40 ` Jens Axboe
2016-08-29 18:40 ` Jens Axboe
2016-09-05 12:02 ` Gabriel Krisman Bertazi
2016-09-05 12:02 ` Gabriel Krisman Bertazi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87d1lfrxb8.fsf@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=krisman@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.