From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752067AbcBVSzZ (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 Feb 2016 13:55:25 -0500 Received: from mga01.intel.com ([192.55.52.88]:31271 "EHLO mga01.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751270AbcBVSzU (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 Feb 2016 13:55:20 -0500 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.22,485,1449561600"; d="scan'208";a="891958276" From: Andi Kleen To: Thomas Gleixner Cc: LKML , Peter Zijlstra , x86@kernel.org, Borislav Petkov , Stephane Eranian , Harish Chegondi , Kan Liang , Andi Kleen , Jacob Pan Subject: Re: [patch V2 00/28] x86/perf/intel/uncore|rapl: Fix error handling and sanitize pmu management References: <20160222110337.198341739@linutronix.de> Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2016 10:55:20 -0800 In-Reply-To: <20160222110337.198341739@linutronix.de> (Thomas Gleixner's message of "Mon, 22 Feb 2016 11:06:42 -0000") Message-ID: <87d1ropobr.fsf@tassilo.jf.intel.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Thomas Gleixner writes: > This series addresses the following issues: FWIW I did a quick read through the series, and except where commented it looks good to me. Reviewed-by: Andi Kleen -Andi -- ak@linux.intel.com -- Speaking for myself only