From: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
To: zhanghailiang <zhang.zhanghailiang@huawei.com>
Cc: quintela@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org,
peter.huangpeng@huawei.com,
"Dr. David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@redhat.com>,
amit.shah@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Adding new migration-parameters - any easier way?
Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2015 10:11:50 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87d20st8vt.fsf@blackfin.pond.sub.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <55815000.8060300@huawei.com> (zhanghailiang's message of "Wed, 17 Jun 2015 18:46:24 +0800")
zhanghailiang <zhang.zhanghailiang@huawei.com> writes:
> Hi,
>
> Is there any news about this discussion?
> Is anyone working on it? ;)
>
> Since the 'hard feature freeze' time is closer, we'd better to fix it in 2.4
> before libvirt uses it.
>
> I have sent a RFC patch "[RFC] migration: Re-implement 'migrate-set-parameters' to make it easily for extension"
> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/482125/
> Which just changes qmp command to
> '{ "execute": "migrate-set-parameters" , "arguments":
> { "compression": { "compress-level": 1 } } }',
> Compared with its original way, it seems to be more easy for reading and extension, but
> it can't address most problems discussed here...
>From a QMP wire protocol point of view, @migrate-set-parameters is just
fine as it is:
#
# @migrate-set-parameters
#
# Set the following migration parameters
#
# @compress-level: compression level
#
# @compress-threads: compression thread count
#
# @decompress-threads: decompression thread count
#
# Since: 2.4
##
{ 'command': 'migrate-set-parameters',
'data': { '*compress-level': 'int',
'*compress-threads': 'int',
'*decompress-threads': 'int'} }
However, as the number of parameters grows, the generated C interface
becomes more and more unwieldy:
void qmp_migrate_set_parameters(bool has_compress_level,
int64_t compress_level,
bool has_compress_threads,
int64_t compress_threads,
bool has_decompress_threads,
int64_t decompress_threads,
... more ...
Error **errp)
Your [RFC PATCH] hides away some of the parameters in a separate
MigrationCompressParameter (misnamed, should be plural). Leads to
void qmp_migrate_set_parameters(bool has_compress,
MigrationCompressParameters *compress,
... more ...
Error **errp)
Makes the QMP wire protocol more complex, because now you have to
collect some parameters in extra curlies.
Note the two levels of optionalness: one for the wrapping struct, one
for each of its members. If you made the members non-optional, we'd
have to specify none or all, which is not what we want. If you made the
wrapping struct non-optional, you'd have to add a stupid 'compress': {}
when you want to set something else. So we need both.
In C, the relatively simple test has_compress_level becomes compress &&
compress->has_level.
If we ever want to set migration parameters from the command line, the
nesting will be in the way. Our tool to parse command line into
QAPI-generated data types (OptsVisitor) by design doesn't cope with
nested structs.
Perhaps the extra complexity is worthwhile, but it's certainly not
obvious.
If all we want is making adding new parameters easier (this thread's
stated subject), then I guess having the function take a single struct
parameter for all its arguments would do:
void qmp_migrate_set_parameters(MigrationParameters *parms,
Error **errp)
To get that from the current QAPI code generator, we'd have to do
something like
{ 'command': 'migrate-set-parameters',
'data': { 'parms': 'MigrationParameters' } }
Trouble is this messes up the QMP wire interface: you now have to wrap
the actual arguments in two curlies instead of one.
Not a backward-compatibility issue, because the command is new.
Ugly all the same.
To avoid the ugliness, we could change the QAPI generator. Currently,
{ 'command': 'migrate-set-parameters',
'data': 'MigrationParameters' }
generates the same interface as when you inline MigrationParameters,
namely
void qmp_migrate_set_parameters(bool has_compress_level,
int64_t compress_level,
bool has_compress_threads,
int64_t compress_threads,
bool has_decompress_threads,
int64_t decompress_threads,
... more ...
Error **errp)
It could instead generate
void qmp_migrate_set_parameters(MigrationParameters *parms,
Error **errp)
No change to the wire protocol. Fairly big, but relatively mechanical
change to the handler functions. I'd be willing to give it a shot and
see how it turns out, but I can't do it for 2.4, sorry.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-06-19 8:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-06-05 9:50 [Qemu-devel] Adding new migration-parameters - any easier way? Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2015-06-05 10:23 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2015-06-05 12:30 ` Eric Blake
2015-06-05 14:00 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2015-06-08 12:48 ` Markus Armbruster
2015-06-08 14:57 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2015-06-09 6:36 ` Markus Armbruster
2015-06-09 8:42 ` [Qemu-devel] qapi: What does "'gen': false" actually do, and when should I use it? (was: Adding new migration-parameters - any easier way?) Markus Armbruster
2015-06-19 10:40 ` [Qemu-devel] qapi: What does "'gen': false" actually do, and when should I use it? Paolo Bonzini
2015-07-02 12:07 ` Markus Armbruster
2015-07-02 12:32 ` Markus Armbruster
2015-06-17 10:46 ` [Qemu-devel] Adding new migration-parameters - any easier way? zhanghailiang
2015-06-19 8:11 ` Markus Armbruster [this message]
2015-06-23 1:43 ` zhanghailiang
2015-06-23 7:50 ` Markus Armbruster
2015-06-23 8:03 ` zhanghailiang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87d20st8vt.fsf@blackfin.pond.sub.org \
--to=armbru@redhat.com \
--cc=amit.shah@redhat.com \
--cc=dgilbert@redhat.com \
--cc=peter.huangpeng@huawei.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=quintela@redhat.com \
--cc=zhang.zhanghailiang@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.