From: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>
To: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>
Cc: Olaf Hering <olaf@aepfle.de>, Wei Liu <wei.liu2@citrix.com>,
Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@citrix.com>,
Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com>,
Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>,
Julien Grall <julien.grall@linaro.org>,
Ian Jackson <ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com>,
Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>, Tim Deegan <tim@xen.org>,
David Vrabel <david.vrabel@citrix.com>,
xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org,
Daniel De Graaf <dgdegra@tycho.nsa.gov>,
Keir Fraser <keir@xen.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 00/10] toolstack-based approach to pvhvm guest kexec
Date: Thu, 28 May 2015 14:27:28 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87d21kq43z.fsf@vitty.brq.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5567241B020000780007E8FA@mail.emea.novell.com> (Jan Beulich's message of "Thu, 28 May 2015 13:20:11 +0100")
"Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@suse.com> writes:
>>>> On 27.05.15 at 17:25, <vkuznets@redhat.com> wrote:
>> This patch series provides x86 PVHVM domains with an ability to perform
>> kexec/kdump-style operations.
>
> Before I get to look at this latest version, may I go a step back and
> ask for clarification whether all of these (seemingly fragile)
> manipulations are actually needed (such a rationale for the series
> would btw be quite good to have in the overview mail, rather than
> having to wade through mailing list history). In particular, why is it
> that we need a new domain in the first place? After all, native
> kexec doesn't imply a new physical machine either. Perhaps that
> was discussed a long while back, but I can't seem to find any of
> that now that I would like to read through it again.
Yes, here are some highlights from last year's discussion:
http://lists.xen.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2014-08/msg01908.html
http://lists.xen.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2014-08/msg01979.html
http://lists.xen.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2014-08/msg01918.html
--
Vitaly
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-05-28 12:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-05-27 15:25 [PATCH v7 00/10] toolstack-based approach to pvhvm guest kexec Vitaly Kuznetsov
2015-05-27 15:25 ` [PATCH v7 01/10] xen: introduce SHUTDOWN_soft_reset shutdown reason Vitaly Kuznetsov
2015-05-27 15:25 ` [PATCH v7 02/10] libxl: support " Vitaly Kuznetsov
2015-06-02 14:58 ` Ian Campbell
2015-05-27 15:25 ` [PATCH v7 03/10] xen: introduce DOMDYING_locked state Vitaly Kuznetsov
2015-05-27 15:25 ` [PATCH v7 04/10] xen: Introduce XEN_DOMCTL_soft_reset Vitaly Kuznetsov
2015-05-28 10:06 ` Tim Deegan
2015-05-28 11:56 ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2015-05-28 12:52 ` Tim Deegan
2015-05-28 13:11 ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2015-05-28 13:37 ` Tim Deegan
2015-05-28 13:53 ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2015-05-28 15:02 ` Jan Beulich
2015-05-27 15:25 ` [PATCH v7 05/10] xsm: add XEN_DOMCTL_soft_reset support Vitaly Kuznetsov
2015-05-27 20:22 ` Daniel De Graaf
2015-05-29 16:16 ` Jan Beulich
2015-05-27 15:25 ` [PATCH v7 06/10] libxc: support XEN_DOMCTL_soft_reset operation Vitaly Kuznetsov
2015-06-02 15:00 ` Ian Campbell
2015-05-27 15:25 ` [PATCH v7 07/10] libxc: introduce soft reset for HVM domains Vitaly Kuznetsov
2015-06-02 15:09 ` Ian Campbell
2015-05-27 15:25 ` [PATCH v7 08/10] xl: introduce enum domain_restart_type Vitaly Kuznetsov
2015-06-02 15:11 ` Ian Campbell
2015-05-27 15:25 ` [PATCH v7 09/10] libxc: add XC_DEVICE_MODEL_SAVE_FILE Vitaly Kuznetsov
2015-06-02 15:12 ` Ian Campbell
2015-05-27 15:25 ` [PATCH v7 10/10] (lib)xl: soft reset support Vitaly Kuznetsov
2015-06-02 15:25 ` Ian Campbell
2015-05-28 12:20 ` [PATCH v7 00/10] toolstack-based approach to pvhvm guest kexec Jan Beulich
2015-05-28 12:27 ` Vitaly Kuznetsov [this message]
2015-05-28 13:05 ` Jan Beulich
2015-05-28 13:41 ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2015-06-02 14:58 ` Ian Campbell
2015-06-02 16:26 ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87d21kq43z.fsf@vitty.brq.redhat.com \
--to=vkuznets@redhat.com \
--cc=JBeulich@suse.com \
--cc=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
--cc=david.vrabel@citrix.com \
--cc=dgdegra@tycho.nsa.gov \
--cc=drjones@redhat.com \
--cc=ian.campbell@citrix.com \
--cc=ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com \
--cc=julien.grall@linaro.org \
--cc=keir@xen.org \
--cc=olaf@aepfle.de \
--cc=stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com \
--cc=tim@xen.org \
--cc=wei.liu2@citrix.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.