All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org, virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: virtio balloon: do not call blocking ops when !TASK_RUNNING
Date: Wed, 04 Mar 2015 16:44:54 +1030	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87d24pjnkx.fsf@rustcorp.com.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150302111358.GA4954@redhat.com>

"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com> writes:
> On Mon, Mar 02, 2015 at 10:37:26AM +1030, Rusty Russell wrote:
>> Thomas Huth <thuth@linux.vnet.ibm.com> writes:
>> > On Thu, 26 Feb 2015 11:50:42 +1030
>> > Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au> wrote:
>> >
>> >> Thomas Huth <thuth@linux.vnet.ibm.com> writes:
>> >> >  Hi all,
>> >> >
>> >> > with the recent kernel 3.19, I get a kernel warning when I start my
>> >> > KVM guest on s390 with virtio balloon enabled:
>> >> 
>> >> The deeper problem is that virtio_ccw_get_config just silently fails on
>> >> OOM.
>> >> 
>> >> Neither get_config nor set_config are expected to fail.
>> >
>> > AFAIK this is currently not a problem. According to
>> > http://lwn.net/Articles/627419/ these kmalloc calls never
>> > fail because they allocate less than a page.
>> 
>> I strongly suggest you unlearn that fact.
>> The fix for this is in two parts:
>> 
>> 1) Annotate using sched_annotate_sleep() and add a comment: we may spin
>>    a few times in low memory situations, but this isn't a high
>>    performance path.
>> 
>> 2) Handle get_config (and other) failure in some more elegant way.
>> 
>> Cheers,
>> Rusty.
>
> I agree, but I'd like to point out that even without kmalloc,
> on s390 get_config is blocking - it's waiting
> for a hardware interrupt.
>
> And it makes sense: config is not data path, I don't think
> we should spin there.
>
> So I think besides these two parts, we still need my two patches:
>     virtio-balloon: do not call blocking ops when !TASK_RUNNING

I prefer to annotate, over trying to fix this.

Because it's not important.  We might spin a few times, but it's very
unlikely, and it's certainly not performance critical.

Thanks,
Rusty.

Subject: virtio_balloon: annotate possible sleep waiting for event.

CCW (s390) does this.

Reported-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>

diff --git a/drivers/virtio/virtio_balloon.c b/drivers/virtio/virtio_balloon.c
index 0413157f3b49..3f4d5acdbde0 100644
--- a/drivers/virtio/virtio_balloon.c
+++ b/drivers/virtio/virtio_balloon.c
@@ -340,6 +340,15 @@ static int balloon(void *_vballoon)
 		s64 diff;
 
 		try_to_freeze();
+
+		/*
+		 * Reading the config on the ccw backend involves an
+		 * allocation, so we may actually sleep and have an
+		 * extra iteration.  It's extremely unlikely, and this
+		 * isn't a fast path in any sense.
+		 */
+		sched_annotate_sleep();
+
 		wait_event_interruptible(vb->config_change,
 					 (diff = towards_target(vb)) != 0
 					 || vb->need_stats_update

  parent reply	other threads:[~2015-03-04  6:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-02-25 10:13 virtio balloon: do not call blocking ops when !TASK_RUNNING Thomas Huth
2015-02-25 11:09 ` Cornelia Huck
2015-02-25 14:17 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2015-02-26  1:20 ` Rusty Russell
2015-02-26  7:36   ` Thomas Huth
2015-02-26  7:36   ` Thomas Huth
2015-03-02  0:07     ` Rusty Russell
2015-03-02 11:13       ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2015-03-02 11:31         ` Cornelia Huck
2015-03-02 11:31         ` Cornelia Huck
2015-03-02 11:46           ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2015-03-02 12:11             ` Cornelia Huck
2015-03-02 12:11             ` Cornelia Huck
2015-03-02 12:19               ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2015-03-02 12:35                 ` Cornelia Huck
2015-03-02 20:44                   ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2015-03-06 11:47                     ` Cornelia Huck
2015-03-06 11:47                     ` Cornelia Huck
2015-03-02 20:44                   ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2015-03-02 12:19               ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2015-03-02 20:39               ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2015-03-02 20:39               ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2015-03-04  6:14         ` Rusty Russell [this message]
2015-03-04 10:25           ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2015-03-06 11:56             ` Cornelia Huck
2015-03-10  1:26               ` Rusty Russell
2015-03-02 11:13       ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2015-02-26  8:30   ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2015-02-26 17:08     ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-02-26 17:27       ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2015-02-26 17:41         ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2015-02-26 17:27       ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2015-02-26  8:45   ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2015-02-26  8:57     ` Cornelia Huck
2015-02-26  8:45   ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2015-02-26  8:47   ` Cornelia Huck
2015-02-26  8:47   ` Cornelia Huck

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87d24pjnkx.fsf@rustcorp.com.au \
    --to=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.