From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: Egbert Eich <eich@suse.de>, Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] drm/i915: Add messages useful for HPD storm detection debugging (v2)
Date: Fri, 26 Jul 2013 15:23:54 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87d2q55x2d.fsf@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1374840864-7677-1-git-send-email-eich@suse.de>
On Fri, 26 Jul 2013, Egbert Eich <eich@suse.de> wrote:
> For HPD storm detection we now mask out individual interrupt source
> bits. We have already seen a case where HPD interrupt enable bits
> were assigned to the wrong pins. To track these conditions more
> easily add some debugging messages.
>
> v2: Spelling fixes as suggested by Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Egbert Eich <eich@suse.de>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c | 7 +++++++
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c
> index ee3e49c..6a1c207 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c
> @@ -919,6 +919,10 @@ static inline void intel_hpd_irq_handler(struct drm_device *dev,
> spin_lock(&dev_priv->irq_lock);
> for (i = 1; i < HPD_NUM_PINS; i++) {
>
> + WARN(((hpd[i] & hotplug_trigger) &&
> + dev_priv->hpd_stats[i].hpd_mark != HPD_ENABLED),
> + "Received HPD interrupt although disabled\n");
> +
> if (!(hpd[i] & hotplug_trigger) ||
> dev_priv->hpd_stats[i].hpd_mark != HPD_ENABLED)
> continue;
> @@ -929,6 +933,7 @@ static inline void intel_hpd_irq_handler(struct drm_device *dev,
> + msecs_to_jiffies(HPD_STORM_DETECT_PERIOD))) {
> dev_priv->hpd_stats[i].hpd_last_jiffies = jiffies;
> dev_priv->hpd_stats[i].hpd_cnt = 0;
> + DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Received HPD interrupt on PIN %d - cnt: 0\n", i);
> } else if (dev_priv->hpd_stats[i].hpd_cnt > HPD_STORM_THRESHOLD) {
> dev_priv->hpd_stats[i].hpd_mark = HPD_MARK_DISABLED;
> dev_priv->hpd_event_bits &= ~(1 << i);
> @@ -936,6 +941,8 @@ static inline void intel_hpd_irq_handler(struct drm_device *dev,
> storm_detected = true;
> } else {
> dev_priv->hpd_stats[i].hpd_cnt++;
> + DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Received HPD interrupt on PIN %d - cnt: %d\n", i,
> + dev_priv->hpd_stats[i].hpd_cnt);
> }
> }
>
> --
> 1.8.1.4
>
--
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Technology Center
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-07-26 12:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-07-26 10:30 [PATCH] drm/i915: Add messages usful for HPD strom detection debugging Egbert Eich
2013-07-26 11:25 ` Jani Nikula
2013-07-26 12:14 ` [PATCH V2] drm/i915: Add messages useful for HPD storm detection debugging (v2) Egbert Eich
2013-07-26 12:23 ` Jani Nikula [this message]
2013-07-26 17:44 ` Daniel Vetter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87d2q55x2d.fsf@intel.com \
--to=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \
--cc=daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch \
--cc=eich@suse.de \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.