From: Kevin Hilman <khilman@deeprootsystems.com>
To: Steve Sakoman <sakoman@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-omap <linux-omap@vger.kernel.org>, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] ARM: Add SMSC911X support to Overo platform
Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 14:18:10 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87d4e4igkd.fsf@deeprootsystems.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5e088bd90901301228l3a0ab25m35a7341ac972e9de@mail.gmail.com> (Steve Sakoman's message of "Fri\, 30 Jan 2009 12\:28\:38 -0800")
Steve Sakoman <sakoman@gmail.com> writes:
> Gumstix will soon be shipping a variant of their Summit board that
> includes an SMSC9221 ethernet interface. This patch is intended to
> provide support via the smsc911x driver when enabled in defconfig.
> The final submission of course will also include an updated defconfig.
>
> Signed-off-by: Steve Sakoman <steve@sakoman.com>
> ---
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-overo.c
> b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-overo.c
> index 9995ac2..97d95a4 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-overo.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-overo.c
> @@ -55,6 +55,63 @@
> #define GPMC_CS0_BASE 0x60
> #define GPMC_CS_SIZE 0x30
>
> +#if defined(CONFIG_SMSC911X) || defined(CONFIG_SMSC911X_MODULE)
> +
> +#include <linux/smsc911x.h>
> +
> +static struct resource overo_smsc911x_resources[] = {
> + {
> + .name = "smsc911x-memory",
> + .flags = IORESOURCE_MEM,
> + },
> + {
> + .flags = IORESOURCE_IRQ | IORESOURCE_IRQ_LOWLEVEL,
> + },
> +};
> +
> +static struct smsc911x_platform_config overo_smsc911x_config = {
> + .irq_polarity = SMSC911X_IRQ_POLARITY_ACTIVE_LOW,
> + .irq_type = SMSC911X_IRQ_TYPE_OPEN_DRAIN,
> + .flags = SMSC911X_USE_32BIT ,
> + .phy_interface = PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_MII,
> +};
> +
> +static struct platform_device overo_smsc911x_device = {
> + .name = "smsc911x",
> + .id = -1,
> + .num_resources = ARRAY_SIZE(overo_smsc911x_resources),
> + .resource = &overo_smsc911x_resources,
> + .dev = {
> + .platform_data = &overo_smsc911x_config,
> + },
> +};
> +
> +static inline void __init overo_init_smsc911x(void)
> +{
> + unsigned long cs_mem_base;
> +
> + if (gpmc_cs_request(OVERO_SMSC911X_CS, SZ_16M, &cs_mem_base) < 0) {
> + printk(KERN_ERR "Failed request for GPMC mem for smsc911x\n");
> + return;
> + }
> +
> + overo_smsc911x_resources[0].start = cs_mem_base + 0x0;
> + overo_smsc911x_resources[0].end = cs_mem_base + 0xff;
> +
> + if ((gpio_request(OVERO_SMSC911X_GPIO, "SMSC911X IRQ") == 0) &&
> + (gpio_direction_input(OVERO_SMSC911X_GPIO) == 0)) {
> + gpio_export(OVERO_SMSC911X_GPIO, 0);
> + } else {
> + printk(KERN_ERR "could not obtain gpio for SMSC911X IRQ\n");
> + return;
> + }
> +
> + overo_smsc911x_resources[1].start = OMAP_GPIO_IRQ(OVERO_SMSC911X_GPIO),
> + overo_smsc911x_resources[1].end = OMAP_GPIO_IRQ(OVERO_SMSC911X_GPIO),
I would put the 'platform_device_register(&overo_smsc911x_device)' here.
> +}
> +
Then here, add:
#else
static inline void __init overo_init_smsc911x(void) { return; }
This allows you to drop the #ifdefs below and have it look a little
cleaner.
Other than that, looks OK to me.
Kevin
> +#endif
> +
> static struct mtd_partition overo_nand_partitions[] = {
> {
> .name = "xloader",
> @@ -187,6 +244,9 @@ static void __init overo_init_irq(void)
> omap2_init_common_hw(mt46h32m32lf6_sdrc_params);
> omap_init_irq();
> omap_gpio_init();
> +#if defined(CONFIG_SMSC911X) || defined(CONFIG_SMSC911X_MODULE)
> + overo_init_smsc911x();
> +#endif
> }
>
> static struct platform_device overo_lcd_device = {
> @@ -204,6 +264,9 @@ static struct omap_board_config_kernel
> overo_config[] __initdata = {
> };
>
> static struct platform_device *overo_devices[] __initdata = {
> +#if defined(CONFIG_SMSC911X) || defined(CONFIG_SMSC911X_MODULE)
> + &overo_smsc911x_device,
> +#endif
> &overo_lcd_device,
> };
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/plat-omap/include/mach/board-overo.h
> b/arch/arm/plat-omap/include/mach/board-overo.h
> index 7ecae66..8635171 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/plat-omap/include/mach/board-overo.h
> +++ b/arch/arm/plat-omap/include/mach/board-overo.h
> @@ -22,5 +22,8 @@
> #define OVERO_GPIO_USBH_CPEN 168
> #define OVERO_GPIO_USBH_NRESET 183
>
> +#define OVERO_SMSC911X_CS 5
> +#define OVERO_SMSC911X_GPIO 176
> +
> #endif /* ____ASM_ARCH_OVERO_H */
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-01-30 22:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-01-30 20:28 [RFC] ARM: Add SMSC911X support to Overo platform Steve Sakoman
2009-01-30 20:43 ` Steve Sakoman
2009-01-30 22:18 ` Kevin Hilman [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87d4e4igkd.fsf@deeprootsystems.com \
--to=khilman@deeprootsystems.com \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sakoman@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.