From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] fbif: Add offset in resize event
Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2008 14:25:35 +0100
Message-ID: <87d4phty5s.fsf@pike.pond.sub.org>
References: <C40FE127.1E5A2%keir.fraser@eu.citrix.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Return-path: <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com>
In-Reply-To: <C40FE127.1E5A2%keir.fraser@eu.citrix.com> (Keir Fraser's message
	of "Wed\, 26 Mar 2008 11\:16\:55 +0000")
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-Help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
To: Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@eu.citrix.com>
Cc: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com, Pat Campbell <plc@novell.com>, Samuel Thibault <samuel.thibault@eu.citrix.com>
List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org

Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@eu.citrix.com> writes:

> Looks like we should slip these in quickly if they are acceptable, as the
> new field is not backward compatible with the original patchset from Pat
> Campbell?
>
>  -- Keir

Correct.

I guess we should zero the complete union xenfb_out_event; it can make
compatible extensions easier.  I'll do that in the pvops frontend.
I don't intend to touch the non-pvops kernel anymore.