From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Dan Smith <danms@us.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: Daily Xen Builds
Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2005 09:58:08 -0700
Message-ID: <87d5mcj8in.fsf@us.ibm.com>
References: <A95E2296287EAD4EB592B5DEEFCE0E9D32E2F7@liverpoolst.ad.cl.cam.ac.uk>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Return-path: <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com>
In-Reply-To: <A95E2296287EAD4EB592B5DEEFCE0E9D32E2F7@liverpoolst.ad.cl.cam.ac.uk>
	(Ian Pratt's message of "Tue, 11 Oct 2005 16:45:52 +0100")
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-Help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
To: Ian Pratt <m+Ian.Pratt@cl.cam.ac.uk>
Cc: xen-devel <xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>, David F Barrera <dfbp@us.ibm.com>
List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org


IP> Well, one thing we will need to watchout for is checkins to
IP> xm-test that add tests that currently fail.

Do you mean tests that exercise things that we know don't work at the
moment?  Would it be sufficient to make sure that those tests are
marked as XFAIL?

I'm very glad to hear about the automated testing-before-pushing
plans.  It sounds great!

-- 
Dan Smith
IBM Linux Technology Center
Open Hypervisor Team
email: danms@us.ibm.com