From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Hubert Chan Subject: Re: Looking to BUY Stock.... Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2003 12:42:53 -0500 Sender: news Message-ID: <87d6mzwrtu.fsf@labatt.uhoreg.ca> References: <1042498438.755@0.0.104> <1042512522.22923.0.camel@dentro.home.net> <3E2383DE.6010700@mb.tu-ilmenau.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Return-path: list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Errors-To: flx@namesys.com List-Id: To: reiserfs-list@namesys.com --=-=-= Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable >>>>> "Manuel" =3D=3D Manuel Krause writes: [...] Manuel> Recently on dri-users @ lists.sourceforge.net I got spam without Manuel> a ** SPAM ** mark in the subject but with the following status Manuel> header (I just include it here in case the list maintainer Manuel> want's some additional settings or for debuggers): ... They might have turned off the ** SPAM ** subject mark. From the "required" setting, it looks like they were getting too many false positives. They probably also turned off the ** SPAM ** mark to let people to their own filtering. (Just a guess.) It's usually best to filter on the X-Spam-Flag header or, if you don't like their settings, on the X-Spam-Status header -- to set the threshold higher or lower. =2D-=20 Hubert Chan - http://www.uhoreg.ca/ PGP/GnuPG key: 1024D/124B61FA Fingerprint: 96C5 012F 5F74 A5F7 1FF7 5291 AF29 C719 124B 61FA Key available at wwwkeys.pgp.net. Encrypted e-mail preferred. --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQA+JEwjZRhU33H9o38RAq+wAJ9C3lg9h1ZyYadYS1zX2CuxsPlUZgCfYS7t 7ioG/HrvhmRQCkM8IxHx4Yw= =7q9Z -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--