From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from galois.linutronix.de (Galois.linutronix.de [193.142.43.55]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3233A8248B; Thu, 18 Sep 2025 20:17:25 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=193.142.43.55 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1758226647; cv=none; b=tvJW9Y/MVSXCdS6OZeVRwnxxLamuA6kzWALcnsFh7DQF11b5eXqO1N6VKMQ3RGRokgUUBmFUoy90S4MBC475mGNOpqDO30Vmj7CJwfcqDwCDbMWGOoRT0a31tkCjEF0vQIUTYIFHU9dz9cd2pXN+QnzX0aZaQC74qjSXiXruWP8= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1758226647; c=relaxed/simple; bh=WuGHsnFI9eaeja/HU/Mvew+i+MRTn5XKGNImCCQx85M=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=XFjr375uovsErBhGwHrzuIpLEjBqf/E/B3M1odszRrYJrqHTsI0403tU5T7DciwOAUt4Wrw0Ebrukoggz6uwqWO65YnfM8WhuQiLThS0/vOPvTiybl/rAqsVaYE4GfX3H3j10RJQOgIpIRX/nAoUyrQEQCoK6HsFeOLpGytJ3Is= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linutronix.de; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linutronix.de; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b=Zv3FZA0T; dkim=permerror (0-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b=GZt8R2jZ; arc=none smtp.client-ip=193.142.43.55 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linutronix.de Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linutronix.de Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b="Zv3FZA0T"; dkim=permerror (0-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b="GZt8R2jZ" From: Thomas Gleixner DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020; t=1758226644; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=WuGHsnFI9eaeja/HU/Mvew+i+MRTn5XKGNImCCQx85M=; b=Zv3FZA0TLz+ouSaXKI1QsG0Xs/Akt1S/CuflT47iBsYPloxG5VFs5PUSj1PubucYMXYtFb rALroA09gMyMoaxlMLKy+xNbvCNJTOJB+J8ofoX4OOTxTrjYVy5woO5QMSIJjdiJXLvsQ8 tfCP9Zext4k1GgIXF7lQG18Ci0PcrxQ2eJ10M5dGE24RUjka37fee9EA57yRfOcC1m6D23 nIb+T5/1iBnAeeK8vyZGV2Ffts1JQOGtobTsgri3ZfuqT0OnN4csQJGwLsxQ3xX6JEk1N4 /lQBilaWqJ+8Wes7TsKjh+wrQdE7moHnBgNJ+Q27ESD4CMtPwBAALLzOdLs0Hw== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020e; t=1758226644; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=WuGHsnFI9eaeja/HU/Mvew+i+MRTn5XKGNImCCQx85M=; b=GZt8R2jZNdqqfDTjq8fQqS7QOz2uGnQ6jFMBKxx9EG0BNs9V376HouuZ+3jPMQBh+UjgEb +jUa1294/+ODK5Cg== To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" , LKML , Randy Dunlap , Linux PM , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Peter Zijlstra Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] smp: Fix up and expand the smp_call_function_many() kerneldoc In-Reply-To: References: <6191405.lOV4Wx5bFT@rafael.j.wysocki> <87h5x088mt.ffs@tglx> Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2025 22:17:22 +0200 Message-ID: <87ecs38qi5.ffs@tglx> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Sep 18 2025 at 12:05, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Thu, Sep 18, 2025 at 10:31=E2=80=AFAM Thomas Gleixner wrote: >> >> On Tue, Sep 16 2025 at 16:13, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: >> >> > On Tue, Sep 9, 2025 at 1:44=E2=80=AFPM Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: >> >> >> >> From: Rafael J. Wysocki >> >> >> >> The smp_call_function_many() kerneldoc comment got out of sync with t= he >> >> function definition (bool parameter "wait" is incorrectly described a= s a >> >> bitmask in it), so fix it up by copying the "wait" description from t= he >> >> smp_call_function() kerneldoc and add information regarding the handl= ing >> >> of the local CPU to it. >> >> >> >> Fixes: 49b3bd213a9f ("smp: Fix all kernel-doc warnings") >> >> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki >> > >> > It's been a week and no feedback. >> > >> > Well, in the further absence of any, I'll assume no concerns and just >> > queue this up. >> >> Sorry, was distracted. No objections from my side. Did you queue it >> already? > > No, I didn't. I pick it up