From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: Yipeng Zou <zouyipeng@huawei.com>,
mingo@redhat.com, bp@alien8.de, dave.hansen@linux.intel.com,
x86@kernel.org, hpa@zytor.com, peterz@infradead.org,
sohil.mehta@intel.com, rui.zhang@intel.com, arnd@arndb.de,
yuntao.wang@linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: zouyipeng@huawei.com
Subject: Re: [BUG REPORT] x86/apic: CPU Hang in x86 VM During Kdump
Date: Sun, 27 Jul 2025 22:01:00 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87ecu1pfnn.ffs@tglx> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250604083319.144500-1-zouyipeng@huawei.com>
On Wed, Jun 04 2025 at 08:33, Yipeng Zou wrote:
> Recently, A issue has been reported that CPU hang in x86 VM.
>
> The CPU halted during Kdump likely due to IPI issues when one CPU was
> rebooting and another was in Kdump:
>
> CPU0 CPU2
> ======================== ======================
> reboot Panic
> machine shutdown Kdump
> machine shutdown
> stop other cpus
> stop other cpus
> ... ...
> local_irq_disable local_irq_disable
> send_IPIs(REBOOT) [critical regions]
> [critical regions] 1) send_IPIs(REBOOT)
After staring more at it, this makes absolutely no sense at all.
stop_other_cpus() does:
/* Only proceed if this is the first CPU to reach this code */
old_cpu = -1;
this_cpu = smp_processor_id();
if (!atomic_try_cmpxchg(&stopping_cpu, &old_cpu, this_cpu))
return;
So CPU2 _cannot_ reach the code, which issues the reboot IPIs, because
at that point @stopping_cpu == 0 ergo the cmpxchg() fails.
So what actually happens in this case is:
CPU0 CPU2
======================== ======================
reboot Panic
machine shutdown Kdump
machine_crash_shutdown()
stop other cpus local_irq_disable()
try_cmpxchg() succeeds stop other cpus
... try_cmpxchg() fails
send_IPIs(REBOOT) --> REBOOT vector becomes pending in IRR
wait timeout
And from there on everything becomes a lottery as CPU0 continues to
execute and CPU2 proceeds and jumps into the crash kernel...
This whole logic is broken...
Nevertheless the patch I sent earlier is definitely making things more
robust, but it won't solve your particular problem.
Thanks,
tglx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-07-27 20:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-06-04 8:33 [BUG REPORT] x86/apic: CPU Hang in x86 VM During Kdump Yipeng Zou
2025-07-26 9:50 ` Yipeng Zou
2025-07-27 12:39 ` Thomas Gleixner
2025-07-27 20:01 ` Thomas Gleixner [this message]
2025-07-29 8:53 ` Thomas Gleixner
2025-07-29 13:35 ` Yipeng Zou
2025-07-29 19:48 ` Thomas Gleixner
2025-08-11 12:51 ` Yipeng Zou
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87ecu1pfnn.ffs@tglx \
--to=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rui.zhang@intel.com \
--cc=sohil.mehta@intel.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=yuntao.wang@linux.dev \
--cc=zouyipeng@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.