From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
Russell King <rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk>
Cc: Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] Generic entry for ARM
Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2025 12:13:32 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87ecz2zelf.ffs@tglx> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CACRpkdZCiiMTwf7eGJJ9aCKFOC3_xTGv1JKQUijjyp+_++cZ_A@mail.gmail.com>
On Fri, Feb 28 2025 at 13:49, Linus Walleij wrote:
> please consider pulling the following git branch for generic entry,
> see below.
>
> This branch was just harvested from my own v5 patch series on
> lore with b4 am -t 20250225-arm-generic-entry-v5-0-2f02313653e5@linaro.org
> then git am on top of v6.14-rc1, so you can do the same if you
> prefer.
>
> It's possible to squash patches, even all of them into one
> big all-or-nothing patch, given the not very gradual nature generic
> entry conversion seems to have.
>
> Main upsides and downsides are in the signed tag.
>
> I don't know who the most important stakeholders are, but I guess
> the context tracker maintainer (Paul McKenney) and the people working
> on generic entry (tglx) could have a say on how important this is, or isn't.
>
> I think it's pretty neat.
It's valuable to consolidate these common functionalities across
architectures as it reduces maintainence costs.
I read through the patches and did not find anything offending there.
Thanks for doing that!
Acked-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-03-12 11:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-02-28 12:49 [GIT PULL] Generic entry for ARM Linus Walleij
2025-03-12 11:13 ` Thomas Gleixner [this message]
2025-03-12 18:00 ` Paul E. McKenney
2025-03-31 21:48 ` Linus Walleij
2025-04-07 17:00 ` Paul E. McKenney
2025-04-07 23:47 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2025-04-08 0:14 ` Steven Rostedt
2025-04-09 14:54 ` Peter Zijlstra
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2025-03-02 15:23 phil995511
2025-03-02 17:17 ` Russell King (Oracle)
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87ecz2zelf.ffs@tglx \
--to=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
--cc=rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.