From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: Fab Stz <fabstz-it@yahoo.fr>, John Stultz <jstultz@google.com>
Cc: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>,
Anna-Maria Behnsen <anna-maria@linutronix.de>,
Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com>,
Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [REGRESSION] ? system is stuck in clocksource, >60s delay at boot time without tsc=unstable
Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2025 20:35:43 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87eczlg6ls.ffs@tglx> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5114de6a-e6ef-4459-9570-6dd2245fabd5@yahoo.fr>
On Tue, Feb 25 2025 at 09:11, Fab Stz wrote:
> Thank you for the patch! I built the 6.1 kernel with it applied and it
> apparently works as expected (no delay). Please find logs below &
> attached dmesg log. Maybe the interesting line is:
>
> Feb 25 08:53:51 debian kernel: tsc: Marking TSC unstable due to TSC
> halts in idle
Correct. That's the missing piece.
> Will the patch also enter the longterm releases like 6.1?
Let me write a proper change log with a Fixes tag and cc stable, so it
will be automatically picked up.
Thanks,
tglx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-02-25 19:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <10cf96aa-1276-4bd4-8966-c890377030c3.ref@yahoo.fr>
2024-11-27 7:18 ` [REGRESSION] ? system is stuck in clocksource, >60s delay at boot time without tsc=unstable Fab Stz
2024-12-27 12:39 ` Fab Stz
2025-01-02 21:49 ` John Stultz
2025-01-02 21:56 ` John Stultz
2025-01-03 15:38 ` Fab Stz
2025-01-03 19:02 ` John Stultz
2025-01-04 22:02 ` Fab Stz
2025-01-15 16:59 ` Thomas Gleixner
2025-02-23 17:01 ` Fab Stz
2025-02-24 8:13 ` Thomas Gleixner
2025-02-25 8:11 ` Fab Stz
2025-02-25 19:35 ` Thomas Gleixner [this message]
2025-02-25 22:37 ` [PATCH] intel_idle: Handle older CPUs, which stop the TSC in deeper C states, correctly Thomas Gleixner
2025-02-26 10:24 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87eczlg6ls.ffs@tglx \
--to=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=anna-maria@linutronix.de \
--cc=daniel.lezcano@linaro.org \
--cc=fabstz-it@yahoo.fr \
--cc=frederic@kernel.org \
--cc=jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com \
--cc=jstultz@google.com \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.