From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Andy Shevchenko <andy@kernel.org>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>,
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
Davide Ciminaghi <ciminaghi@gnudd.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/11] x86: Kconfig.cpu: split out 64-bit atom
Date: Wed, 04 Dec 2024 14:16:50 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87ed2nsi4d.ffs@tglx> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241204103042.1904639-4-arnd@kernel.org>
On Wed, Dec 04 2024 at 11:30, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
>
> Both 32-bit and 64-bit builds allow optimizing using "-march=atom", but
> this is somewhat suboptimal, as gcc and clang use this option to refer
> to the original in-order "Bonnell" microarchitecture used in the early
> "Diamondville" and "Silverthorne" processors that were mostly 32-bit only.
>
> The later 22nm "Silvermont" architecture saw a significant redesign to
> an out-of-order architecture that is reflected in the -mtune=silvermont
> flag in the compilers, and all of these are 64-bit capable.
In theory. There are quite some crippled variants of silvermont which
are 32-bit only (either fused or at least officially not-supported to
run 64-bit)...
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-12-04 13:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 77+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-12-04 10:30 [PATCH 00/11] x86: 32-bit cleanups Arnd Bergmann
2024-12-04 10:30 ` [PATCH 01/11] x86/Kconfig: Geode CPU has cmpxchg8b Arnd Bergmann
2024-12-04 10:30 ` [PATCH 02/11] x86: drop 32-bit "bigsmp" machine support Arnd Bergmann
2024-12-04 10:30 ` [PATCH 03/11] x86: Kconfig.cpu: split out 64-bit atom Arnd Bergmann
2024-12-04 13:16 ` Thomas Gleixner [this message]
2024-12-04 15:55 ` H. Peter Anvin
2024-12-04 18:21 ` Andy Shevchenko
2024-12-04 10:30 ` [PATCH 04/11] x86: split CPU selection into 32-bit and 64-bit Arnd Bergmann
2024-12-04 18:31 ` Andy Shevchenko
2024-12-04 21:18 ` Arnd Bergmann
2024-12-04 10:30 ` [PATCH 05/11] x86: remove HIGHMEM64G support Arnd Bergmann
2024-12-04 13:29 ` Brian Gerst
2024-12-04 13:43 ` Arnd Bergmann
2024-12-04 14:02 ` Brian Gerst
2024-12-04 15:00 ` Brian Gerst
2024-12-04 15:58 ` H. Peter Anvin
2024-12-04 15:53 ` H. Peter Anvin
2024-12-04 16:37 ` H. Peter Anvin
2024-12-04 16:55 ` Arnd Bergmann
2024-12-04 18:37 ` Andy Shevchenko
2024-12-04 21:14 ` Arnd Bergmann
2025-04-11 23:44 ` Dave Hansen
2025-04-12 8:39 ` Ingo Molnar
2025-04-12 10:05 ` Mike Rapoport
2025-04-12 10:44 ` Arnd Bergmann
2025-04-12 19:48 ` Ingo Molnar
2025-04-13 8:08 ` [PATCH] x86/e820: discard high memory that can't be addressed by 32-bit systems Mike Rapoport
2025-04-13 9:23 ` [tip: x86/urgent] x86/e820: Discard " tip-bot2 for Mike Rapoport (Microsoft)
2025-04-14 14:19 ` Dave Hansen
2025-04-15 7:18 ` Mike Rapoport
2025-04-15 13:43 ` Dave Hansen
2025-04-16 7:17 ` Ingo Molnar
2025-04-16 7:51 ` Ingo Molnar
2025-04-16 7:24 ` tip-bot2 for Mike Rapoport (Microsoft)
2025-04-16 8:16 ` tip-bot2 for Mike Rapoport (Microsoft)
2025-04-17 16:22 ` [PATCH] x86/e820: discard " Nathan Chancellor
2025-04-18 6:33 ` Ingo Molnar
2025-04-18 9:01 ` Mike Rapoport
2025-04-18 12:59 ` Ingo Molnar
2025-04-18 19:25 ` Mike Rapoport
2025-04-18 19:29 ` Dave Hansen
2025-04-18 19:49 ` Guenter Roeck
2025-04-12 10:40 ` [PATCH 05/11] x86: remove HIGHMEM64G support Arnd Bergmann
2024-12-04 10:30 ` [PATCH 06/11] x86: drop SWIOTLB and PHYS_ADDR_T_64BIT for PAE Arnd Bergmann
2024-12-04 18:41 ` Andy Shevchenko
2024-12-04 20:52 ` Arnd Bergmann
2024-12-05 7:59 ` Andy Shevchenko
2024-12-04 10:30 ` [PATCH 07/11] x86: drop support for CONFIG_HIGHPTE Arnd Bergmann
2024-12-04 10:30 ` [PATCH 08/11] x86: document X86_INTEL_MID as 64-bit-only Arnd Bergmann
2024-12-04 18:55 ` Andy Shevchenko
2024-12-04 20:38 ` Arnd Bergmann
2024-12-05 8:03 ` Andy Shevchenko
2024-12-06 11:23 ` Ferry Toth
2024-12-06 14:27 ` Arnd Bergmann
2024-12-04 10:30 ` [PATCH 09/11] x86: rework CONFIG_GENERIC_CPU compiler flags Arnd Bergmann
2024-12-04 15:36 ` Tor Vic
2024-12-04 17:51 ` Arnd Bergmann
2024-12-04 17:09 ` Nathan Chancellor
2024-12-04 17:52 ` Arnd Bergmann
2024-12-04 18:10 ` Linus Torvalds
2024-12-04 19:43 ` Arnd Bergmann
2024-12-04 23:33 ` Linus Torvalds
2024-12-05 8:13 ` Andy Shevchenko
2024-12-05 10:09 ` Arnd Bergmann
2024-12-05 11:17 ` Andy Shevchenko
2024-12-05 11:58 ` Arnd Bergmann
2024-12-05 12:35 ` Jason A. Donenfeld
2024-12-05 9:46 ` Arnd Bergmann
2024-12-05 10:01 ` Andy Shevchenko
2024-12-05 10:47 ` Arnd Bergmann
2024-12-05 8:07 ` Andy Shevchenko
2024-12-06 13:56 ` David Laight
2024-12-04 10:30 ` [PATCH 10/11] x86: remove old STA2x11 support Arnd Bergmann
2024-12-05 7:35 ` Davide Ciminaghi
2024-12-04 10:30 ` [PATCH 11/11] x86: drop 32-bit KVM host support Arnd Bergmann
2024-12-04 15:30 ` Sean Christopherson
2024-12-04 16:33 ` Arnd Bergmann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87ed2nsi4d.ffs@tglx \
--to=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=andy@kernel.org \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=arnd@kernel.org \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=ciminaghi@gnudd.com \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.