All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kalle Valo <kvalo@kernel.org>
To: "Paweł Owoc" <frut3k7@gmail.com>
Cc: Jeff Johnson <quic_jjohnson@quicinc.com>,
	 Jeff Johnson <jjohnson@kernel.org>,
	 linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, ath10k@lists.infradead.org,
	 linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] wifi: ath10k: add channel 177 for 5 GHz band
Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2024 14:49:44 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87ed4dr5pj.fsf@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAKEyCaDUfn4jtCdTt9JJ-Qe+CCudORPwcjj5i5=G28ANc+eCRg@mail.gmail.com> ("Paweł Owoc"'s message of "Fri, 18 Oct 2024 00:51:59 +0200")

Paweł Owoc <frut3k7@gmail.com> writes:

> On Fri, Oct 11, 2024 at 6:51 PM Jeff Johnson <quic_jjohnson@quicinc.com> wrote:
>>
>> On 10/8/2024 11:49 PM, Paweł Owoc wrote:> Add support for channel 177 (5885
>> MHz ) for the 5 GHz band.
>> >
>> > Tested-on: qca988x hw2.0 firmware ver 10.2.4-1.0-00047
>>
>> Can you elaborate on what was tested in your commit text? And more
>> importantly, what is the impact on existing devices, especially given that
>> existing devices would not have calibration data for this channel in the board
>> files? Does the QCA988x board file even have calibration data for this channel?
>>
> In the case of ath10k we use an external regulatory database.
> For the country "US" channels 169, 173 and 177 are marked as NO-IR and
> we cannot run AP on them.
> Even if channels are not disabled in the board files:
>             * 5845.0 MHz [169] (27.0 dBm) (no IR)
>             * 5865.0 MHz [173] (27.0 dBm) (no IR)
>             * 5885.0 MHz [177] (27.0 dBm) (no IR)
>
> I only tested the use as a client on channel 177:
> root@OpenWrt:~# iwinfo phy1 scan
> Cell 01 - Address: XX:XX:XX:XX:XX:XX
>           ESSID: "ch177"
>           Mode: Master  Frequency: 5.885 GHz  Band: 5 GHz  Channel: 177
>           Signal: -43 dBm  Quality: 67/70
>           Encryption: mixed WPA2/WPA3 PSK/SAE (CCMP)
>           HT Operation:
>                     Primary Channel: 177
>                     Secondary Channel Offset: no secondary
>                     Channel Width: 20 MHz

I wonder how this works with QCA6174, unfortunately I'm not able to test
that.

-- 
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/list/

https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches


  reply	other threads:[~2024-10-18 11:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-08-01 20:23 [PATCH] wifi: ath10k: add channel 177 for 5 GHz band Paweł Owoc
2024-10-09  6:49 ` [PATCH v2] " Paweł Owoc
2024-10-11 16:51   ` Jeff Johnson
2024-10-17 22:51     ` Paweł Owoc
2024-10-18 11:49       ` Kalle Valo [this message]
2024-10-19 15:32         ` Paweł Owoc
2025-09-17 16:17           ` Paweł Owoc
2026-03-19 12:26             ` Paweł Owoc

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87ed4dr5pj.fsf@kernel.org \
    --to=kvalo@kernel.org \
    --cc=ath10k@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=frut3k7@gmail.com \
    --cc=jjohnson@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=quic_jjohnson@quicinc.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.