From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
To: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/i915: remove unused leftover basedie step code
Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2024 11:44:00 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87ed6b3c8f.fsf@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240822150716.GL5774@mdroper-desk1.amr.corp.intel.com>
On Thu, 22 Aug 2024, Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 22, 2024 at 05:39:46PM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
>> The basedie step initialization as well as its last users were removed
>> in commit 326e30e4624c ("drm/i915: Drop dead code for pvc"). Follow
>> through with removing the unused macros and struct member and debug
>> logging.
>>
>> Suggested-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h | 5 -----
>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.c | 1 -
>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_step.h | 1 -
>> 3 files changed, 7 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
>> index 3b1b16e71cf9..eb4c33e83c7c 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
>> @@ -410,7 +410,6 @@ static inline struct intel_gt *to_gt(const struct drm_i915_private *i915)
>>
>> #define INTEL_GRAPHICS_STEP(__i915) (RUNTIME_INFO(__i915)->step.graphics_step)
>> #define INTEL_MEDIA_STEP(__i915) (RUNTIME_INFO(__i915)->step.media_step)
>> -#define INTEL_BASEDIE_STEP(__i915) (RUNTIME_INFO(__i915)->step.basedie_step)
>>
>> #define IS_GRAPHICS_STEP(__i915, since, until) \
>> (drm_WARN_ON(&(__i915)->drm, INTEL_GRAPHICS_STEP(__i915) == STEP_NONE), \
>> @@ -420,10 +419,6 @@ static inline struct intel_gt *to_gt(const struct drm_i915_private *i915)
>> (drm_WARN_ON(&(__i915)->drm, INTEL_MEDIA_STEP(__i915) == STEP_NONE), \
>> INTEL_MEDIA_STEP(__i915) >= (since) && INTEL_MEDIA_STEP(__i915) < (until))
>>
>> -#define IS_BASEDIE_STEP(__i915, since, until) \
>> - (drm_WARN_ON(&(__i915)->drm, INTEL_BASEDIE_STEP(__i915) == STEP_NONE), \
>> - INTEL_BASEDIE_STEP(__i915) >= (since) && INTEL_BASEDIE_STEP(__i915) < (until))
>> -
>> static __always_inline unsigned int
>> __platform_mask_index(const struct intel_runtime_info *info,
>> enum intel_platform p)
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.c
>> index d92b3050ac78..b485e959f064 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.c
>> @@ -108,7 +108,6 @@ void intel_device_info_print(const struct intel_device_info *info,
>>
>> drm_printf(p, "graphics stepping: %s\n", intel_step_name(runtime->step.graphics_step));
>> drm_printf(p, "media stepping: %s\n", intel_step_name(runtime->step.media_step));
>> - drm_printf(p, "base die stepping: %s\n", intel_step_name(runtime->step.basedie_step));
>>
>> drm_printf(p, "gt: %d\n", info->gt);
>> drm_printf(p, "memory-regions: 0x%x\n", info->memory_regions);
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_step.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_step.h
>> index 83bd1190edf5..22f1d6905160 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_step.h
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_step.h
>> @@ -17,7 +17,6 @@ struct intel_step_info {
>> */
>> u8 graphics_step; /* Represents the compute tile on Xe_HPC */
>
> Looks like we should drop the comment on this line too (Xe_HPC is the
> name of PVC's IP)...
Cleanups for another time...
>
>
> Reviewed-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Thanks for the review, pushed this one.
BR,
Jani.
>
>> u8 media_step;
>> - u8 basedie_step;
>> };
>>
>> #define STEP_ENUM_VAL(name) STEP_##name,
>> --
>> 2.39.2
>>
--
Jani Nikula, Intel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-08-26 8:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-08-22 14:39 [PATCH] drm/i915: remove unused leftover basedie step code Jani Nikula
2024-08-22 15:07 ` Matt Roper
2024-08-26 8:44 ` Jani Nikula [this message]
2024-08-22 15:31 ` ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: warning for " Patchwork
2024-08-22 15:40 ` ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork
2024-08-22 21:55 ` [PATCH] " Cavitt, Jonathan
2024-08-23 8:52 ` ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: warning for drm/i915: remove unused leftover basedie step code (rev2) Patchwork
2024-08-23 8:59 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2024-08-24 11:49 ` ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87ed6b3c8f.fsf@intel.com \
--to=jani.nikula@intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=matthew.d.roper@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.