All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ritesh Harjani (IBM) <ritesh.list@gmail.com>
To: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>, Ted Tso <tytso@mit.edu>
Cc: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org,
	Gao Xiang <hsiangkao@linux.alibaba.com>,
	Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>, Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
	stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] ext4: Properly sync file size update after O_SYNC direct IO
Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2023 23:33:56 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87edhyielv.fsf@doe.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231013121350.26872-1-jack@suse.cz>

Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> writes:

> Gao Xiang has reported that on ext4 O_SYNC direct IO does not properly
> sync file size update and thus if we crash at unfortunate moment, the
> file can have smaller size although O_SYNC IO has reported successful
> completion. The problem happens because update of on-disk inode size is
> handled in ext4_dio_write_iter() *after* iomap_dio_rw() (and thus
> dio_complete() in particular) has returned and generic_file_sync() gets
> called by dio_complete(). Fix the problem by handling on-disk inode size
> update directly in our ->end_io completion handler.
>
> References: https://lore.kernel.org/all/02d18236-26ef-09b0-90ad-030c4fe3ee20@linux.alibaba.com
> Reported-by: Gao Xiang <hsiangkao@linux.alibaba.com>
> CC: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Fixes: 378f32bab371 ("ext4: introduce direct I/O write using iomap infrastructure")
> Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
> ---
>  fs/ext4/file.c | 153 +++++++++++++++++++++----------------------------
>  1 file changed, 65 insertions(+), 88 deletions(-)
>
> Changes since v2:
> * Added more comments explaining the code flow
> * Added WARN_ON_ONCE to verify extending IO is handled synchronously
>
> Changes since v1:
> * Rebased on top of Linus' tree (instead of a tree with iomap cleanup)
> * Made ext4_dio_write_end_io() always return number of written bytes on
>   success for consistency

Thanks for addressing it. It's always better to have a consistent return
value wherever possible.

> * Added Fixes tag

Looks good to me. Please feel free to add - 

Reviewed-by: Ritesh Harjani (IBM) <ritesh.list@gmail.com>

  reply	other threads:[~2023-10-13 18:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-10-13 12:13 [PATCH v3] ext4: Properly sync file size update after O_SYNC direct IO Jan Kara
2023-10-13 18:03 ` Ritesh Harjani [this message]
2023-10-18  6:45 ` Joseph Qi
2023-10-19 12:10   ` Jan Kara
2023-10-23  0:55 ` Theodore Ts'o

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87edhyielv.fsf@doe.com \
    --to=ritesh.list@gmail.com \
    --cc=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=hsiangkao@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tytso@mit.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.