From: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com>
To: Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@intel.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@intel.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
nvdimm@lists.linux.dev, linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org,
Huang Ying <ying.huang@intel.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@Huawei.com>,
Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@redhat.com>,
Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] mm/memory_hotplug: split memmap_on_memory requests across memblocks
Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2023 17:50:41 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87edl1a21y.fsf@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230720-vv-kmem_memmap-v2-2-88bdaab34993@intel.com>
Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@intel.com> writes:
> The MHP_MEMMAP_ON_MEMORY flag for hotplugged memory is currently
> restricted to 'memblock_size' chunks of memory being added. Adding a
> larger span of memory precludes memmap_on_memory semantics.
>
> For users of hotplug such as kmem, large amounts of memory might get
> added from the CXL subsystem. In some cases, this amount may exceed the
> available 'main memory' to store the memmap for the memory being added.
> In this case, it is useful to have a way to place the memmap on the
> memory being added, even if it means splitting the addition into
> memblock-sized chunks.
>
> Change add_memory_resource() to loop over memblock-sized chunks of
> memory if caller requested memmap_on_memory, and if other conditions for
> it are met,. Teach try_remove_memory() to also expect that a memory
> range being removed might have been split up into memblock sized chunks,
> and to loop through those as needed.
>
This conflicts with https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/20230718024409.95742-1-aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com/
IIUC Andrew was planning add that series to -mm. Also that patchset makes
some of related changes in this patch not required. Can you rebase this
series on top of that ?
>
> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
> Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
> Cc: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>
> Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
> Cc: Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@intel.com>
> Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
> Cc: Huang Ying <ying.huang@intel.com>
> Suggested-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@intel.com>
> ---
> mm/memory_hotplug.c | 154 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------------
> 1 file changed, 91 insertions(+), 63 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/memory_hotplug.c b/mm/memory_hotplug.c
> index e9bcacbcbae2..20456f0d28e6 100644
> --- a/mm/memory_hotplug.c
> +++ b/mm/memory_hotplug.c
> @@ -1286,6 +1286,35 @@ bool mhp_supports_memmap_on_memory(unsigned long size)
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(mhp_supports_memmap_on_memory);
>
> +static int add_memory_create_devices(int nid, struct memory_group *group,
> + u64 start, u64 size, mhp_t mhp_flags)
> +{
> + struct mhp_params params = { .pgprot = pgprot_mhp(PAGE_KERNEL) };
> + struct vmem_altmap mhp_altmap = {};
> + int ret;
> +
> + if ((mhp_flags & MHP_MEMMAP_ON_MEMORY)) {
> + mhp_altmap.free = PHYS_PFN(size);
> + mhp_altmap.base_pfn = PHYS_PFN(start);
> + params.altmap = &mhp_altmap;
> + }
> +
> + /* call arch's memory hotadd */
> + ret = arch_add_memory(nid, start, size, ¶ms);
> + if (ret < 0)
> + return ret;
> +
> + /* create memory block devices after memory was added */
> + ret = create_memory_block_devices(start, size, mhp_altmap.alloc,
> + group);
> + if (ret) {
> + arch_remove_memory(start, size, NULL);
> + return ret;
> + }
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> /*
> * NOTE: The caller must call lock_device_hotplug() to serialize hotplug
> * and online/offline operations (triggered e.g. by sysfs).
> @@ -1294,11 +1323,10 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(mhp_supports_memmap_on_memory);
> */
> int __ref add_memory_resource(int nid, struct resource *res, mhp_t mhp_flags)
> {
> - struct mhp_params params = { .pgprot = pgprot_mhp(PAGE_KERNEL) };
> + unsigned long memblock_size = memory_block_size_bytes();
> enum memblock_flags memblock_flags = MEMBLOCK_NONE;
> - struct vmem_altmap mhp_altmap = {};
> struct memory_group *group = NULL;
> - u64 start, size;
> + u64 start, size, cur_start;
> bool new_node = false;
> int ret;
>
> @@ -1339,27 +1367,20 @@ int __ref add_memory_resource(int nid, struct resource *res, mhp_t mhp_flags)
> /*
> * Self hosted memmap array
> */
> - if (mhp_flags & MHP_MEMMAP_ON_MEMORY) {
> - if (!mhp_supports_memmap_on_memory(size)) {
> - ret = -EINVAL;
> + if ((mhp_flags & MHP_MEMMAP_ON_MEMORY) &&
> + mhp_supports_memmap_on_memory(memblock_size)) {
> + for (cur_start = start; cur_start < start + size;
> + cur_start += memblock_size) {
> + ret = add_memory_create_devices(nid, group, cur_start,
> + memblock_size,
> + mhp_flags);
> + if (ret)
> + goto error;
> + }
> + } else {
> + ret = add_memory_create_devices(nid, group, start, size, mhp_flags);
> + if (ret)
> goto error;
> - }
> - mhp_altmap.free = PHYS_PFN(size);
> - mhp_altmap.base_pfn = PHYS_PFN(start);
> - params.altmap = &mhp_altmap;
> - }
> -
> - /* call arch's memory hotadd */
> - ret = arch_add_memory(nid, start, size, ¶ms);
> - if (ret < 0)
> - goto error;
> -
> - /* create memory block devices after memory was added */
> - ret = create_memory_block_devices(start, size, mhp_altmap.alloc,
> - group);
> - if (ret) {
> - arch_remove_memory(start, size, NULL);
> - goto error;
> }
>
> if (new_node) {
> @@ -2035,12 +2056,38 @@ void try_offline_node(int nid)
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(try_offline_node);
>
> -static int __ref try_remove_memory(u64 start, u64 size)
> +static void __ref __try_remove_memory(int nid, u64 start, u64 size,
> + struct vmem_altmap *altmap)
> {
> - struct vmem_altmap mhp_altmap = {};
> - struct vmem_altmap *altmap = NULL;
> - unsigned long nr_vmemmap_pages;
> - int rc = 0, nid = NUMA_NO_NODE;
> + /* remove memmap entry */
> + firmware_map_remove(start, start + size, "System RAM");
> +
> + /*
> + * Memory block device removal under the device_hotplug_lock is
> + * a barrier against racing online attempts.
> + */
> + remove_memory_block_devices(start, size);
> +
> + mem_hotplug_begin();
> +
> + arch_remove_memory(start, size, altmap);
> +
> + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARCH_KEEP_MEMBLOCK)) {
> + memblock_phys_free(start, size);
> + memblock_remove(start, size);
> + }
> +
> + release_mem_region_adjustable(start, size);
> +
> + if (nid != NUMA_NO_NODE)
> + try_offline_node(nid);
> +
> + mem_hotplug_done();
> +}
> +
> +static int try_remove_memory(u64 start, u64 size)
> +{
> + int rc, nid = NUMA_NO_NODE;
>
> BUG_ON(check_hotplug_memory_range(start, size));
>
> @@ -2058,20 +2105,21 @@ static int __ref try_remove_memory(u64 start, u64 size)
> return rc;
>
> /*
> - * We only support removing memory added with MHP_MEMMAP_ON_MEMORY in
> - * the same granularity it was added - a single memory block.
> + * For memmap_on_memory, the altmaps could have been added on
> + * a per-memblock basis. Loop through the entire range if so,
> + * and remove each memblock and its altmap
> */
> if (mhp_memmap_on_memory()) {
> - nr_vmemmap_pages = walk_memory_blocks(start, size, NULL,
> - get_nr_vmemmap_pages_cb);
> - if (nr_vmemmap_pages) {
> - if (size != memory_block_size_bytes()) {
> - pr_warn("Refuse to remove %#llx - %#llx,"
> - "wrong granularity\n",
> - start, start + size);
> - return -EINVAL;
> - }
> + unsigned long memblock_size = memory_block_size_bytes();
> + struct vmem_altmap mhp_altmap = {};
> + struct vmem_altmap *altmap;
> + u64 cur_start;
>
> + for (cur_start = start; cur_start < start + size;
> + cur_start += memblock_size) {
> + unsigned long nr_vmemmap_pages =
> + walk_memory_blocks(start, memblock_size, NULL,
> + get_nr_vmemmap_pages_cb);
> /*
> * Let remove_pmd_table->free_hugepage_table do the
> * right thing if we used vmem_altmap when hot-adding
> @@ -2079,33 +2127,13 @@ static int __ref try_remove_memory(u64 start, u64 size)
> */
> mhp_altmap.alloc = nr_vmemmap_pages;
> altmap = &mhp_altmap;
> + __try_remove_memory(nid, cur_start, memblock_size,
> + altmap);
> }
> + } else {
> + __try_remove_memory(nid, start, size, NULL);
> }
>
> - /* remove memmap entry */
> - firmware_map_remove(start, start + size, "System RAM");
> -
> - /*
> - * Memory block device removal under the device_hotplug_lock is
> - * a barrier against racing online attempts.
> - */
> - remove_memory_block_devices(start, size);
> -
> - mem_hotplug_begin();
> -
> - arch_remove_memory(start, size, altmap);
> -
> - if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARCH_KEEP_MEMBLOCK)) {
> - memblock_phys_free(start, size);
> - memblock_remove(start, size);
> - }
> -
> - release_mem_region_adjustable(start, size);
> -
> - if (nid != NUMA_NO_NODE)
> - try_offline_node(nid);
> -
> - mem_hotplug_done();
> return 0;
> }
>
>
> --
> 2.41.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-07-21 12:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-07-20 7:14 [PATCH v2 0/3] mm: use memmap_on_memory semantics for dax/kmem Vishal Verma
2023-07-20 7:14 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] mm/memory_hotplug: Export symbol mhp_supports_memmap_on_memory() Vishal Verma
2023-07-24 6:00 ` Huang, Ying
2023-07-20 7:14 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] mm/memory_hotplug: split memmap_on_memory requests across memblocks Vishal Verma
2023-07-21 12:20 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V [this message]
2023-07-23 14:53 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2023-07-24 3:16 ` Huang, Ying
2023-08-02 6:02 ` Verma, Vishal L
2023-08-14 6:04 ` Huang, Ying
2023-07-24 5:54 ` Huang, Ying
2023-08-02 6:08 ` Verma, Vishal L
2023-08-14 6:45 ` Huang, Ying
2023-08-14 7:20 ` David Hildenbrand
2023-07-20 7:14 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] dax/kmem: allow kmem to add memory with memmap_on_memory Vishal Verma
2023-07-25 15:54 ` [PATCH v2 0/3] mm: use memmap_on_memory semantics for dax/kmem David Hildenbrand
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87edl1a21y.fsf@linux.ibm.com \
--to=aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=Jonathan.Cameron@Huawei.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=dave.jiang@intel.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=jmoyer@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=nvdimm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=osalvador@suse.de \
--cc=vishal.l.verma@intel.com \
--cc=ying.huang@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.