From: John Ogness <john.ogness@linutronix.de>
To: David Laight <David.Laight@ACULAB.COM>,
'Petr Mladek' <pmladek@suse.com>,
"Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@zx2c4.com>
Cc: Marco Elver <elver@google.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: 5.19 printk breaks message ordering
Date: Sun, 19 Jun 2022 10:21:37 +0206 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87edzlrrva.fsf@jogness.linutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <a35dc47eb9924d56bb6dca7868c34c94@AcuMS.aculab.com>
On 2022-06-17, David Laight <David.Laight@ACULAB.COM> wrote:
> What priority do these kthreads run at?
120 (SCHED_OTHER, nice=0)
> I'd have thought they ought to run at a high priority?
> That should tend to give kernel messages priority over user ones.
>
> Quite how high is another matter.
> Probably a bit below the RT/FIFO:50 of threaded ISR.
As a default value, I recommend keeping to the SCHED_OTHER policy as a
default. Perhaps a nice value of -20? There are quite a few kernel
threads using that as their default:
# ps -Leo ni,command | grep ^-20 | sort
-20 [acpi_thermal_pm]
-20 [ata_sff]
-20 [blkcg_punt_bio]
-20 [cfg80211]
-20 [inet_frag_wq]
-20 [ipv6_addrconf]
-20 [kblockd]
-20 [kworker/0:0H-events_highpri]
-20 [kworker/0:1H-events_highpri]
-20 [md]
-20 [mld]
-20 [mm_percpu_wq]
-20 [netns]
-20 [nfsiod]
-20 [rcu_gp]
-20 [rcu_par_gp]
-20 [rpciod]
-20 [scsi_tmf_0]
-20 [scsi_tmf_1]
-20 [writeback]
-20 [xprtiod]
John Ogness
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-06-19 8:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-06-17 13:23 5.19 printk breaks message ordering Jason A. Donenfeld
2022-06-17 13:37 ` Jason A. Donenfeld
2022-06-17 13:38 ` [PATCH] printk: allow direct console printing to be enabled always Jason A. Donenfeld
2022-06-19 0:30 ` Randy Dunlap
2022-06-19 8:37 ` Jason A. Donenfeld
2022-06-19 11:05 ` John Ogness
2022-06-19 20:39 ` Jason A. Donenfeld
2022-06-19 20:43 ` [PATCH v2] " Jason A. Donenfeld
2022-06-19 23:17 ` John Ogness
2022-06-19 23:28 ` Jason A. Donenfeld
2022-06-19 23:33 ` [PATCH v3] " Jason A. Donenfeld
2022-06-20 16:58 ` Petr Mladek
2022-06-20 17:03 ` Jason A. Donenfeld
2022-06-21 9:43 ` David Laight
2022-06-21 9:59 ` Jason A. Donenfeld
2022-06-22 12:55 ` Jason A. Donenfeld
2022-06-20 4:04 ` [PATCH v2] " David Laight
2022-06-20 5:17 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2022-06-20 7:56 ` Jason A. Donenfeld
2022-06-21 1:34 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2022-06-21 21:47 ` John Ogness
2022-06-17 14:21 ` 5.19 printk breaks message ordering Petr Mladek
2022-06-17 14:41 ` Jason A. Donenfeld
2022-06-17 15:01 ` David Laight
2022-06-19 8:15 ` John Ogness [this message]
2022-06-19 14:24 ` David Laight
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87edzlrrva.fsf@jogness.linutronix.de \
--to=john.ogness@linutronix.de \
--cc=David.Laight@ACULAB.COM \
--cc=Jason@zx2c4.com \
--cc=elver@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pmladek@suse.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.