From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 References: <20220403144348.1775590-1-rpm@xenomai.org> <317493564.212576.1649003575604.JavaMail.zimbra@nod.at> <87ilrqnjdp.fsf@xenomai.org> <656392314.214549.1649064591209.JavaMail.zimbra@nod.at> From: Philippe Gerum Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] x86: dovetail: reinstate I/O bitmap on user entry Date: Mon, 04 Apr 2022 18:22:58 +0200 In-reply-to: <656392314.214549.1649064591209.JavaMail.zimbra@nod.at> Message-ID: <87ee2colqg.fsf@xenomai.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable List-Id: Discussions about the Xenomai project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Richard Weinberger Cc: xenomai Richard Weinberger writes: > ----- Urspr=C3=BCngliche Mail ----- >> Von: "Philippe Gerum" >> These are the two remaining patches in the final series, ok for both? >>=20 >> tick: irq_pipeline: fix proxying of a broadcast device >> x86: dovetail: reinstate I/O bitmap on user entry > > I meant this patches; > [PATCH 1/4] sched: dovetail: pass thread-info bits to arch_dovetail_switc= h_finish() > [PATCH 2/4] ARM: dovetail: fix up arch_dovetail_switch_finish() > [PATCH 3/4] arm64: dovetail: fix up arch_dovetail_switch_finish() > [PATCH 4/4] x86: dovetail: reinstate I/O bitmap on out-of-band user entry > > Where 4/4 got replaced by this v2 one. > > I didn't look into "tick: irq_pipeline: fix proxying of a broadcast devic= e" but can later today. > > BTW: Do you have a Patchwork instance for the Xenomai mailing list? Unfortunately not. > I makes dealing with patch > series so much easier. > > Or even better, can we have Xenomai at lore.kernel.org? Then we can use b= 4. :-) > It seems unlikely that kernel.org would consider hosting us since the project does not upstream patches to the mainline kernel. --=20 Philippe.