From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
To: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>,
Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>,
Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] How to fix screen resolution detection?
Date: Mon, 20 Dec 2021 12:14:48 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87ee671t2f.fsf@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Yby4ooKl43NRm+5y@rowland.harvard.edu>
On Fri, 17 Dec 2021, Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu> wrote:
> The screen resolution on my laptop is not reported accurately. Here's
> an extract from the output of xdpyinfo:
>
> screen #0:
> dimensions: 3200x1800 pixels (847x476 millimeters)
> resolution: 96x96 dots per inch
>
> The number of pixels is correct, but the size and resolution values
> smack of a bogus default. The actual width of the screen (determined
> with a tape measure) is about 11.5 inches (291 mm), which yields a
> resolution of 280 dots per inch (11 dots per mm), approximately.
> Most definitely _not_ 96 dpi.
>
> Presumably X gets the size/resolution information from Wayland, which
> gets it from the kernel, which gets it from the firmware. So the kernel
> driver is the logical place to start in figuring where things are going
> wrong. The laptop uses i915; here are the relevant lines from the
> kernel log:
>
> [ 0.000000] Linux version 5.14.9-200.fc34.x86_64 (mockbuild@bkernel02.iad2.fedoraproject.org) (gcc (GCC) 11.2.1 20210728 (Red Hat 11.2.1-1), GNU ld version 2.35.2-5.fc34) #1 SMP Thu Sep 30 11:55:35 UTC 2021
>
> [ 0.463895] efifb: probing for efifb
> [ 0.463913] efifb: framebuffer at 0xe0000000, using 22500k, total 22500k
> [ 0.463916] efifb: mode is 3200x1800x32, linelength=12800, pages=1
> [ 0.463919] efifb: scrolling: redraw
> [ 0.463920] efifb: Truecolor: size=8:8:8:8, shift=24:16:8:0
> [ 0.464028] Console: switching to colour frame buffer device 400x112
> [ 0.474894] fb0: EFI VGA frame buffer device
>
> [ 2.888858] fb0: switching to inteldrmfb from EFI VGA
> [ 2.891260] Console: switching to colour dummy device 80x25
> [ 2.891318] i915 0000:00:02.0: vgaarb: deactivate vga console
> [ 2.902665] i915 0000:00:02.0: vgaarb: changed VGA decodes: olddecodes=io+mem,decodes=io+mem:owns=io+mem
> [ 2.904833] i915 0000:00:02.0: [drm] Finished loading DMC firmware i915/skl_dmc_ver1_27.bin (v1.27)
> [ 2.947359] [drm] Initialized i915 1.6.0 20201103 for 0000:00:02.0 on minor 0
> [ 2.949468] ACPI: video: Video Device [GFX0] (multi-head: yes rom: no post: no)
> [ 2.949803] input: Video Bus as /devices/LNXSYSTM:00/LNXSYBUS:00/PNP0A08:00/LNXVIDEO:00/input/input9
> [ 2.964371] fbcon: i915 (fb0) is primary device
> [ 2.979854] Console: switching to colour frame buffer device 400x112
> [ 3.012355] i915 0000:00:02.0: [drm] fb0: i915 frame buffer device
>
> Now, I know nothing about the kernel's graphics subsystems. How can I
> find out what size/resolution information i915 is getting and passing to
> Wayland? If it's wrong, how can I fix it?
I could be wrong, but I think userspace figures the dimensions from the
EDID itself, not through a kernel API.
I actually get slightly different results from xrandr, xdpyinfo, and
edid-decode on the EDID. What does edid-decode tell you for the
dimensions? For me it's 'edid-decode /sys/class/drm/card0-DP-3/edid' but
replace the subdir with your info.
xdpyinfo also gives me 96x96 dpi, probably bogus.
BR,
Jani.
--
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-12-20 10:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-12-17 16:19 [Intel-gfx] How to fix screen resolution detection? Alan Stern
2021-12-18 21:37 ` Alan Stern
2021-12-18 21:37 ` Alan Stern
2021-12-20 10:14 ` Jani Nikula [this message]
2021-12-20 21:50 ` [Intel-gfx] " Alan Stern
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87ee671t2f.fsf@intel.com \
--to=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
--cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.