From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============9181072238535224291=="
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
To: kbuild-all@lists.01.org
Subject: Re: [linuxppc:next-test 150/209] arch/powerpc/mm/book3s64/radix_pgtable.c:183:6: error: no previous prototype for 'radix__change_memory_range'
Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2021 21:36:20 +1000
Message-ID: <87eefdrtcb.fsf@mpe.ellerman.id.au>
In-Reply-To: <5fa303d2-404b-689e-aa2b-c7272d9f8f5a@intel.com>
List-Id: <oe-kbuild-all.lists.linux.dev>

--===============9181072238535224291==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Rong Chen <rong.a.chen@intel.com> writes:
> Hi Michael,
>
> On 4/13/21 9:53 PM, Michael Ellerman wrote:
>> kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com> writes:
>>> tree:   https://github.com/linuxppc/linux next-test
>>> head:   7626ae32a84371a7790955cc086d1f570b2e14ba
>>> commit: bd573a81312fd9d6520b1cc81a88fd29e670e1ff [150/209] powerpc/mm/6=
4s: Allow STRICT_KERNEL_RWX again
>>> config: powerpc-skiroot_defconfig (attached as .config)
>>> compiler: powerpc64le-linux-gcc (GCC) 9.3.0
>>> reproduce (this is a W=3D1 build):
>>               ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>>
>> I spent a while scratching my head over this one, before noticing this
>> little message that this is a W=3D1 build.
>>
>> Do you think you could make it more obvious that it's a W=3D1 build?
>
> Thanks for the feedback, we enabled W=3D1 by default for now, it looks =

> silly if adding in the subject,

OK.

> so we have changed the reproduce command to show the option:
>
>  =C2=A0 COMPILER_INSTALL_PATH=3D$HOME/0day COMPILER=3Dgcc-9.3.0 make.cros=
s W=3D1 ARCH=3Dpowerpc

Nice, thanks!

cheers
--===============9181072238535224291==--