From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.6 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE95FCA9EAE for ; Tue, 29 Oct 2019 14:12:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 95A222087E for ; Tue, 29 Oct 2019 14:12:18 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b="YUoMczlL" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 95A222087E Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Received: from localhost ([::1]:57216 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iPSEL-0001uS-2a for qemu-devel@archiver.kernel.org; Tue, 29 Oct 2019 10:12:17 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:58835) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iPSCX-00006w-BS for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 29 Oct 2019 10:10:26 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iPS8r-00047j-Rt for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 29 Oct 2019 10:06:42 -0400 Received: from us-smtp-2.mimecast.com ([205.139.110.61]:52511 helo=us-smtp-delivery-1.mimecast.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iPS8r-00047b-O6 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 29 Oct 2019 10:06:37 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1572357997; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=sEBGXjTaxukdq83mRizQInab2bBgIDPPas2PkYHDYSM=; b=YUoMczlLT6cjfsd2+usYMAq3ULBQ/HvwQ4xHH3N+PXb9m66rEFsuPDaNihdLNMloHR5vd2 sSxGP+MSkqV/PCcYiNLvO6wr1c/AL2O7shQQ1rGJiwhqHyn6E4km1XPWAv0xWoSOnCZElr 1cWSoHIcwCLkQFc+dDFsZlpySp41498= Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-150-AhGBrXzJOl6rOJ-B_nHvSA-1; Tue, 29 Oct 2019 10:06:29 -0400 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx07.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.22]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ADCB85EC; Tue, 29 Oct 2019 14:06:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from blackfin.pond.sub.org (unknown [10.36.118.123]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F15D210027B5; Tue, 29 Oct 2019 14:05:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: by blackfin.pond.sub.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 6284D11385C9; Tue, 29 Oct 2019 15:05:35 +0100 (CET) From: Markus Armbruster To: Jens Freimann Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 05/11] qapi: add unplug primary event References: <20191029114905.6856-1-jfreimann@redhat.com> <20191029114905.6856-6-jfreimann@redhat.com> <87mudjpvgl.fsf@dusky.pond.sub.org> <20191029134637.nvdbj3dn7rna2olq@jenstp.localdomain> Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2019 15:05:35 +0100 In-Reply-To: <20191029134637.nvdbj3dn7rna2olq@jenstp.localdomain> (Jens Freimann's message of "Tue, 29 Oct 2019 14:46:37 +0100") Message-ID: <87eeyvode8.fsf@dusky.pond.sub.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.84 on 10.5.11.22 X-MC-Unique: AhGBrXzJOl6rOJ-B_nHvSA-1 X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=WINDOWS-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 205.139.110.61 X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: berrange@redhat.com, ehabkost@redhat.com, quintela@redhat.com, aadam@redhat.com, jasowang@redhat.com, mst@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, dgilbert@redhat.com, alex.williamson@redhat.com, laine@redhat.com, pbonzini@redhat.com, ailan@redhat.com, parav@mellanox.com Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" Jens Freimann writes: > On Tue, Oct 29, 2019 at 01:50:02PM +0100, Markus Armbruster wrote: >>Jens Freimann writes: >> >>> This event is emitted when we sent a request to unplug a >> >>Uh, "we sent a requestion [...] from the Guest OS"... do you mean "we >>received"? > > No, we sent a pci hotplug event to the guest by "pushing" the pcie attent= ion > button. So, it's QEMU requesting the unplug. So if it's QEMU who does the sending, then saying "we sent [...] from the Guest OS does not compute for me. Do you mean "sent to"? [...]