All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
diff for duplicates of <87ef3fweoq.fsf@oldenburg2.str.redhat.com>

diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N1/1.txt
index 59a8eec..3f3f85d 100644
--- a/a/1.txt
+++ b/N1/1.txt
@@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ The ABI was supposed to be finalized and everyone involved thought it
 had been reviewed by the GNU gABI community and other interested
 parties.  It had been included in binutils for several releases.
 
->From my point of view, the kernel is just a consumer of the ABI.  The
+From my point of view, the kernel is just a consumer of the ABI.  The
 kernel would not change an instruction encoding if it doesn't like it
 for some reason, either.
 
diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N1/content_digest
index e40200c..449358a 100644
--- a/a/content_digest
+++ b/N1/content_digest
@@ -38,7 +38,7 @@
  "had been reviewed by the GNU gABI community and other interested\n"
  "parties.  It had been included in binutils for several releases.\n"
  "\n"
- ">From my point of view, the kernel is just a consumer of the ABI.  The\n"
+ "From my point of view, the kernel is just a consumer of the ABI.  The\n"
  "kernel would not change an instruction encoding if it doesn't like it\n"
  "for some reason, either.\n"
  "\n"
@@ -56,4 +56,4 @@
  "Thanks,\n"
  Florian
 
-eeed7e9c1034b04e1a4315c9dfd8e30230cb4db71399b0f02b65923254c327fa
+a6a1c6a205bf69d55127ace0b0b6bf4975d64ad200583a1e85089dedd6d08f7c

diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N2/1.txt
index 59a8eec..6007430 100644
--- a/a/1.txt
+++ b/N2/1.txt
@@ -7,21 +7,3 @@
 The ABI was supposed to be finalized and everyone involved thought it
 had been reviewed by the GNU gABI community and other interested
 parties.  It had been included in binutils for several releases.
-
->From my point of view, the kernel is just a consumer of the ABI.  The
-kernel would not change an instruction encoding if it doesn't like it
-for some reason, either.
-
-> While the upstream kernel should make some reasonble effort to make
-> sure that RHEL 8 binaries will continue to run, I don't see why we
-> need to go out of our way to keep the full set of mitigations
-> available for binaries that were developed against a non-upstream
-> kernel.
-
-They were developed against the ABI specification.
-
-I do not have a strong opinion what the kernel should do going forward.
-I just want to make clear what happened.
-
-Thanks,
-Florian
diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N2/content_digest
index e40200c..12601ad 100644
--- a/a/content_digest
+++ b/N2/content_digest
@@ -25,7 +25,16 @@
   Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>
   Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
   Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
- " Mike Kravetz <mike.kravet>\0"
+  Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>
+  Nadav Amit <nadav.amit@gmail.com>
+  Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
+  Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
+  Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
+  Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>
+  Ravi V. Shankar <ravi.v.shankar@intel.com>
+  Vedvyas Shanbhogue <vedvyas.shanbhogue@intel.com>
+  Szabolcs Nagy <szabolcs.nagy@arm.com>
+ " libc-alpha <libc-alpha@sourceware.org>\0"
  "\00:1\0"
  "b\0"
  "* Andy Lutomirski:\n"
@@ -36,24 +45,6 @@
  "\n"
  "The ABI was supposed to be finalized and everyone involved thought it\n"
  "had been reviewed by the GNU gABI community and other interested\n"
- "parties.  It had been included in binutils for several releases.\n"
- "\n"
- ">From my point of view, the kernel is just a consumer of the ABI.  The\n"
- "kernel would not change an instruction encoding if it doesn't like it\n"
- "for some reason, either.\n"
- "\n"
- "> While the upstream kernel should make some reasonble effort to make\n"
- "> sure that RHEL 8 binaries will continue to run, I don't see why we\n"
- "> need to go out of our way to keep the full set of mitigations\n"
- "> available for binaries that were developed against a non-upstream\n"
- "> kernel.\n"
- "\n"
- "They were developed against the ABI specification.\n"
- "\n"
- "I do not have a strong opinion what the kernel should do going forward.\n"
- "I just want to make clear what happened.\n"
- "\n"
- "Thanks,\n"
- Florian
+ parties.  It had been included in binutils for several releases.
 
-eeed7e9c1034b04e1a4315c9dfd8e30230cb4db71399b0f02b65923254c327fa
+6ccfa5adc85d3c81af9040265dce6ac661f5db63c01a3a18b3fe18412483717a

diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N3/1.txt
index 59a8eec..3f3f85d 100644
--- a/a/1.txt
+++ b/N3/1.txt
@@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ The ABI was supposed to be finalized and everyone involved thought it
 had been reviewed by the GNU gABI community and other interested
 parties.  It had been included in binutils for several releases.
 
->From my point of view, the kernel is just a consumer of the ABI.  The
+From my point of view, the kernel is just a consumer of the ABI.  The
 kernel would not change an instruction encoding if it doesn't like it
 for some reason, either.
 
diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N3/content_digest
index e40200c..a6be4cc 100644
--- a/a/content_digest
+++ b/N3/content_digest
@@ -12,7 +12,7 @@
   Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
   Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
   LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
-  open list:DOCUMENTATION <linux-doc@vger.kernel.org>
+ " open list\\:DOCUMENTATION <linux-doc@vger.kernel.org>"
   Linux-MM <linux-mm@kvack.org>
   linux-arch <linux-arch@vger.kernel.org>
   Linux API <linux-api@vger.kernel.org>
@@ -25,7 +25,16 @@
   Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>
   Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
   Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
- " Mike Kravetz <mike.kravet>\0"
+  Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>
+  Nadav Amit <nadav.amit@gmail.com>
+  Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
+  Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
+  Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
+  Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>
+  Ravi V. Shankar <ravi.v.shankar@intel.com>
+  Vedvyas Shanbhogue <vedvyas.shanbhogue@intel.com>
+  Szabolcs Nagy <szabolcs.nagy@arm.com>
+ " libc-alpha <libc-alpha@sourceware.org>\0"
  "\00:1\0"
  "b\0"
  "* Andy Lutomirski:\n"
@@ -38,7 +47,7 @@
  "had been reviewed by the GNU gABI community and other interested\n"
  "parties.  It had been included in binutils for several releases.\n"
  "\n"
- ">From my point of view, the kernel is just a consumer of the ABI.  The\n"
+ "From my point of view, the kernel is just a consumer of the ABI.  The\n"
  "kernel would not change an instruction encoding if it doesn't like it\n"
  "for some reason, either.\n"
  "\n"
@@ -56,4 +65,4 @@
  "Thanks,\n"
  Florian
 
-eeed7e9c1034b04e1a4315c9dfd8e30230cb4db71399b0f02b65923254c327fa
+2bbb886028b54d993eb108a132713baf7299430b05a3805f019e1c2b1f7591c6

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.