From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B33CC004C9 for ; Tue, 7 May 2019 13:23:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1F9EF2053B for ; Tue, 7 May 2019 13:23:46 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 1F9EF2053B Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:46775 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hO04P-0004S2-Au for qemu-devel@archiver.kernel.org; Tue, 07 May 2019 09:23:45 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:33538) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hO037-0003my-Nl for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 07 May 2019 09:22:26 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hO036-0005qk-Lx for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 07 May 2019 09:22:25 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:51498) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hO034-0005pA-HU; Tue, 07 May 2019 09:22:22 -0400 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx06.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.16]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 96CE859473; Tue, 7 May 2019 13:22:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from blackfin.pond.sub.org (ovpn-116-28.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.116.28]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CCA445C3FA; Tue, 7 May 2019 13:22:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: by blackfin.pond.sub.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 47AE51132B35; Tue, 7 May 2019 15:22:09 +0200 (CEST) From: Markus Armbruster To: Thomas Huth References: <20190502084506.8009-1-thuth@redhat.com> <20190502084506.8009-7-thuth@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 07 May 2019 15:22:09 +0200 In-Reply-To: <20190502084506.8009-7-thuth@redhat.com> (Thomas Huth's message of "Thu, 2 May 2019 10:45:05 +0200") Message-ID: <87ef5acsce.fsf@dusky.pond.sub.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.16 X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.39]); Tue, 07 May 2019 13:22:21 +0000 (UTC) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.132.183.28 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 6/7] tests/qemu-iotests/group: Re-use the "auto" group for tests that can always run X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Fam Zheng , Kevin Wolf , Ed Maste , qemu-block@nongnu.org, Philippe =?utf-8?Q?Mathieu-Daud=C3=A9?= , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Christophe Fergeau , Max Reitz , Wainer dos Santos Moschetta , Alex =?utf-8?Q?Benn=C3=A9e?= , Li-Wen Hsu Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" Thomas Huth writes: > Currently, all tests are in the "auto" group. This is a little bit pointless. > OTOH, we need a group for the tests that we can automatically run during > "make check" each time, too. Tests in this new group are supposed to run > with every possible QEMU configuration, for example they must run with every > QEMU binary (also non-x86), without failing when an optional features is > missing (but reporting "skip" is ok), and be able to run on all kind of host > filesystems and users (i.e. also as "nobody" or "root"). > So let's use the "auto" group for this class of tests now. The initial > list has been determined by running the iotests with non-x86 QEMU targets > and with our CI pipelines on Gitlab, Cirrus-CI and Travis (i.e. including > macOS and FreeBSD). I wonder whether we should additionally limit "make check" to "quick" tests. How slow are the non-quick auto tests for you?