From: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>
To: "Suthikulpanit\, Suravee" <Suravee.Suthikulpanit@amd.com>
Cc: "joro\@8bytes.org" <joro@8bytes.org>,
"pbonzini\@redhat.com" <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
"rkrcmar\@redhat.com" <rkrcmar@redhat.com>,
"linux-kernel\@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"kvm\@vger.kernel.org" <kvm@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] svm/avic: Fix invalidate logical APIC id entry
Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2019 14:04:01 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87ef6zcb7i.fsf@vitty.brq.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190322101706.9377-1-suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com>
"Suthikulpanit, Suravee" <Suravee.Suthikulpanit@amd.com> writes:
> Only clear the valid bit when invalidate logical APIC id entry.
> The current logic clear the valid bit, but also set the rest of
> the bits (including reserved bits) to 1.
>
> Fixes: 98d90582be2e ('svm: Fix AVIC DFR and LDR handling')
> Signed-off-by: Suravee Suthikulpanit <suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/kvm/svm.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c b/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c
> index 7a4ce1a22ca0..f4fb766e474c 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c
> @@ -4640,7 +4640,7 @@ static void avic_invalidate_logical_id_entry(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> u32 *entry = avic_get_logical_id_entry(vcpu, svm->ldr_reg, flat);
>
> if (entry)
> - WRITE_ONCE(*entry, (u32) ~AVIC_LOGICAL_ID_ENTRY_VALID_MASK);
> + WRITE_ONCE(*entry, (u32)(*entry & ~AVIC_LOGICAL_ID_ENTRY_VALID_MASK));
I'm not sure how important this is, but this change creates a tiny time
window between reading from *entry and writing there. Should we use
atomic bitops instead?
> }
>
> static int avic_handle_ldr_update(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
--
Vitaly
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-03-22 13:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-03-22 10:17 [PATCH] svm/avic: Fix invalidate logical APIC id entry Suthikulpanit, Suravee
2019-03-22 13:04 ` Vitaly Kuznetsov [this message]
2019-03-26 3:47 ` Suthikulpanit, Suravee
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87ef6zcb7i.fsf@vitty.brq.redhat.com \
--to=vkuznets@redhat.com \
--cc=Suravee.Suthikulpanit@amd.com \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=rkrcmar@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.