From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix, from userid 118) id 0E5DFE00C74; Fri, 20 Apr 2018 05:26:37 -0700 (PDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on yocto-www.yoctoproject.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-HAM-Report: * -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low * trust * [62.142.5.116 listed in list.dnswl.org] * -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% * [score: 0.0000] Received: from emh06.mail.saunalahti.fi (emh06.mail.saunalahti.fi [62.142.5.116]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C34DEE00C58 for ; Fri, 20 Apr 2018 05:26:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: from uwe1 (85-76-108-172-nat.elisa-mobile.fi [85.76.108.172]) by emh06.mail.saunalahti.fi (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31C043008B; Fri, 20 Apr 2018 15:26:33 +0300 (EEST) From: Uwe Geuder To: yocto@yoctoproject.org In-Reply-To: <5ad9c6a8.08aa370a.e3f10.cf1eSMTPIN_ADDED_BROKEN@mx.google.com> References: Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2018 15:26:32 +0300 Message-ID: <87efja6p3b.fsf@snkmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: Usage of yocto on different (production vs debug) scenarios X-BeenThere: yocto@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of all things Yocto Project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2018 12:26:37 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Following up on my own message... On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 1:47 PM, Uwe Geuder wrote: > On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 10:59 AM, Iv=C3=A1n Castell wrote: > [...] >> However, things are getting complicated, because there is no way to >> exclude some recipes easily. For example, we don't want iptables >> installed on the debug image, but dependency chains include iptables >> by default > > Doesn't blacklist do what you want? > > E.g. in your distro-production.conf > > PNBLACKLIST[iptables] =3D "we don't want iptables in product" > As recently mentioned in another thread on this list there is also BBMASK. https://lists.yoctoproject.org/pipermail/yocto/2018-April/040861.html I don't know what would be the suitable/most idiomatic use cases for PNBLACKLIST vs. BBMASK Regards, Uwe Geuder Neuro Event Labs Oy Tampere, Finland uwe.gexder@neuroeventlabs.com (Bot check: fix one obvious typo)