From: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Cc: Wireless <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux-Next Mailing List <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>,
Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the wireless-drivers-next tree with Linus' tree
Date: Fri, 04 Aug 2017 09:36:26 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87efsrn8k5.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170804120408.0d147e86@canb.auug.org.au> (Stephen Rothwell's message of "Fri, 4 Aug 2017 12:04:08 +1000")
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> writes:
> Today's linux-next merge of the wireless-drivers-next tree got a
> conflict in:
>
> drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/mvm/ops.c
>
> between commit:
>
> bf8b286f86fc ("iwlwifi: mvm: defer setting IWL_MVM_STATUS_IN_HW_RESTART")
>
> from Linus' tree and commit:
>
> 7174beb60c53 ("iwlwifi: refactor firmware debug code")
>
> from the wireless-drivers-next tree.
>
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating
> with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> complex conflicts.
Thanks, the resolution looks good. I'll notify Dave about this when I
send the wireless-drivers-next pull request to him.
--
Kalle Valo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-08-04 6:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-08-04 2:04 linux-next: manual merge of the wireless-drivers-next tree with Linus' tree Stephen Rothwell
2017-08-04 6:36 ` Kalle Valo [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2017-08-24 1:28 Stephen Rothwell
2017-08-24 1:24 Stephen Rothwell
2017-08-24 1:24 ` Stephen Rothwell
2017-08-24 1:17 Stephen Rothwell
2017-08-24 1:32 ` Stephen Rothwell
2017-08-24 7:44 ` Kalle Valo
2015-12-07 3:13 Stephen Rothwell
2015-12-07 14:59 ` Kalle Valo
2015-12-07 17:51 ` Kalle Valo
2015-12-07 17:51 ` Kalle Valo
2015-02-09 3:14 Stephen Rothwell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87efsrn8k5.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com \
--to=kvalo@codeaurora.org \
--cc=johannes.berg@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luciano.coelho@intel.com \
--cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.