From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from ozlabs.org (ozlabs.org [103.22.144.67]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3wnl7n3sdNzDqLH for ; Wed, 14 Jun 2017 21:40:53 +1000 (AEST) From: Michael Ellerman To: Nicholas Piggin , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Cc: "Gautham R . Shenoy" , Nicholas Piggin Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/13] powerpc/64s: cpuidle set polling before enabling irqs In-Reply-To: <20170613130557.26315-10-npiggin@gmail.com> References: <20170613130557.26315-1-npiggin@gmail.com> <20170613130557.26315-10-npiggin@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 14 Jun 2017 21:40:52 +1000 Message-ID: <87efum3igr.fsf@concordia.ellerman.id.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Nicholas Piggin writes: > local_irq_enable can cause interrupts to be taken which could > take significant amount of processing time. The idle process > should set its polling flag before this, so another process that > wakes it during this time will not have to send an IPI. > > Expand the TIF_POLLING_NRFLAG coverage to as large as possible. > > Reviewed-by: Gautham R. Shenoy > Signed-off-by: Nicholas Piggin > --- > drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-powernv.c | 4 +++- > drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-pseries.c | 3 ++- > 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) I don't think the cpuidle folks are really interested in these changes, but we should Cc them to be polite. Can you resend patches 9, 10, 11 with a subject like: "cpuidle: powernv: Set polling ..." And Cc the cpuidle folks: $ ./scripts/get_maintainer.pl -f drivers/cpuidle rjw@rjwysocki.net daniel.lezcano@linaro.org linux-pm@vger.kernel.org linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org cheers