From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============6979266209844018718=="
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Huang, Ying <ying.huang@intel.com>
To: lkp@lists.01.org
Subject: Re: [lkp-robot] [sched/idle] bb400b924e: fio.write_clat_95%_us -8% improvement
Date: Fri, 07 Apr 2017 15:18:35 +0800
Message-ID: <87efx48z3o.fsf@yhuang-dev.intel.com>
In-Reply-To: <070BEF4AC20468458C22969097656CD94BFB573E@shsmsx102.ccr.corp.intel.com>
List-Id: <oe-lkp.lists.linux.dev>

--===============6979266209844018718==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

"Li, Aubrey" <aubrey.li@intel.com> writes:

>> =

>> For this kind of test, to avoid pollute the results of 0-Day, it is bett=
er for you to
>> take the machine out of 0-Day to do the test.  You can test with lkp-tes=
ts with
>> the same job file.
>
> Can you please specify how to take the machine out of 0-day but still tes=
t with
> lkp-tests with the same job file?  =

>
> setup lkp test on my own? how to prevent lkp schedule task on this machin=
e?

Lei will take care of take the machine out of 0-day.

To run lkp-tests on your own, please refer to,

https://docs.google.com/a/intel.com/presentation/d/1c1qDq8przc1jJTJWq1VDhiI=
fjC7uhuRsaPdeZmOn-qQ/edit?usp=3Dsharing

Best Regards,
Huang, Ying

> Thanks,
> -Aubrey

--===============6979266209844018718==--