From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:60921) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZvrOb-0002WF-BX for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 09 Nov 2015 13:42:26 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZvrOX-0007eh-2z for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 09 Nov 2015 13:42:25 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:52280) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZvrOW-0007eP-TZ for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 09 Nov 2015 13:42:20 -0500 Received: from int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.22]) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D1982A2C2E for ; Mon, 9 Nov 2015 18:42:19 +0000 (UTC) From: Markus Armbruster References: <1446791754-23823-1-git-send-email-eblake@redhat.com> <87oaf7xghp.fsf@blackfin.pond.sub.org> <563CD085.7040203@redhat.com> <87611bmr2q.fsf@blackfin.pond.sub.org> <5640B109.5050104@redhat.com> Date: Mon, 09 Nov 2015 19:42:17 +0100 In-Reply-To: <5640B109.5050104@redhat.com> (Eric Blake's message of "Mon, 9 Nov 2015 07:43:21 -0700") Message-ID: <87egfzauba.fsf@blackfin.pond.sub.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v10 00/30] qapi member collision (post-introspection cleanups, subset C') List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Eric Blake Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Eric Blake writes: > On 11/09/2015 02:59 AM, Markus Armbruster wrote: >> Eric Blake writes: >> >>> On 11/06/2015 09:03 AM, Markus Armbruster wrote: >>>> Eric Blake writes: >> [...] >>>>> Hopefully, we are converging on something that will be ready >>>>> for a pull request, especially for the earlier patches of this >>>>> subset. >>>> >>>> I guess you mean PATCH 01-12. I had a few questions, but the most >>>> likely outcome seems to be minor touchups I could apply in my tree. >>>> >>>> I'm okay with trying to get more patches in, but let's get these out of >>>> the way meanwhile. >>> >>> Yes, 01-12 seems like a good first set, if you want to make those >>> touchups (I've supplied some potential text improvements in reply to >>> some of your comments); I'm happy, as always, to take a peek over your >>> staging repo to double check what you are prepping for the pull request. >> >> Please have a look at my qapi-next branch. > > Close, but commit 5f72bb85 on that branch is missing the one-line summary: > > qapi: Simplify error cleanup in test-qmp-* Fixed & sent pull request, thanks!