From: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>, Anton Blanchard <anton@samba.org>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, paulus@samba.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] powerpc/mm: Add trace point for tracking hash pte fault
Date: Thu, 02 Apr 2015 14:14:18 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87ego2c42l.fsf@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87y4og70nu.fsf@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
"Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> writes:
> Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> writes:
>
....
....
> With patch:
> sys: 0m11.3258
>
> ie, a -0.7% impact
>
> If that impact is high we could possibly put that tracepoint within #ifdef
> CONFIG_DEBUG_VM ?
Since the ebizzy runs results were not stable, I did a micro benchmark
to measure this and I noticed that results observed are within the
run variance of the test. I made sure we don't have context-switches
between the runs. If I try to get large number of page-faults, we end up
with context switches.
for ex: We get without patch
--------------------------------
root@qemu-pr-host trace-fault]# bash run
Performance counter stats for './a.out 3000 300':
643 page-faults # 0.089 M/sec
7.236562 task-clock (msec) # 0.928 CPUs utilized
2,179,213 stalled-cycles-frontend # 0.00% frontend cycles idle
17,174,367 stalled-cycles-backend # 0.00% backend cycles idle
0 context-switches # 0.000 K/sec
0.007794658 seconds time elapsed
[root@qemu-pr-host trace-fault]#
And with-patch:
---------------
[root@qemu-pr-host trace-fault]# bash run
Performance counter stats for './a.out 3000 300':
643 page-faults # 0.089 M/sec
7.233746 task-clock (msec) # 0.921 CPUs utilized
0 context-switches # 0.000 K/sec
0.007854876 seconds time elapsed
Performance counter stats for './a.out 3000 300':
643 page-faults # 0.087 M/sec
649 powerpc:hash_fault # 0.087 M/sec
7.430376 task-clock (msec) # 0.938 CPUs utilized
2,347,174 stalled-cycles-frontend # 0.00% frontend cycles idle
17,524,282 stalled-cycles-backend # 0.00% backend cycles idle
0 context-switches # 0.000 K/sec
0.007920284 seconds time elapsed
[root@qemu-pr-host trace-fault]#
prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-04-02 8:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-01-20 11:35 [PATCH] powerpc/mm: Add trace point for tracking hash pte fault Aneesh Kumar K.V
2015-01-21 3:07 ` Michael Ellerman
2015-01-21 8:45 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2015-01-28 6:11 ` Michael Ellerman
2015-02-02 10:26 ` Anton Blanchard
2015-02-02 16:21 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2015-02-02 22:01 ` Anton Blanchard
2015-02-03 3:07 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2015-02-02 16:12 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2015-04-02 8:44 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87ego2c42l.fsf@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=anton@samba.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.