From: Kevin Hilman <khilman@linaro.org>
To: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Cc: linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Clark Williams <clark.williams@gmail.com>,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>,
open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] sched/nohz: add sysctl control over sched_tick_max_deferment
Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2013 13:34:23 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87ehbx6drk.fsf@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130619184238.GD21522@somewhere.redhat.com> (Frederic Weisbecker's message of "Wed, 19 Jun 2013 20:42:40 +0200")
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com> writes:
> On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 04:58:28PM -0700, Kevin Hilman wrote:
>> Allow sysctl override of sched_tick_max_deferment in order to ease
>> finding/fixing the remaining issues with full nohz.
>>
>> The value to be written is in jiffies, and -1 means the max deferment
>> is disabled (scheduler_tick_max_deferment() returns KTIME_MAX.)
>>
>> Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@linaro.org>
>
> This looks like a useful thing but I wonder if a debugfs file would
> be more appropriate than sysctl.
>
> The scheduler tick max deferment is supposed to be a temporary
> hack so we probably don't want to bring a real user ABI for that.
I wondered about that as well, but I wasn't sure if the existing knobs
under CONFIG_SCHED_DEBUG (sched_min_granularity_ns, sched_latency_ns,
etc.) are considered permanant ABI, or optional debugging tools.
This new option is inside CONFIG_SCHED_DEBUG along with the others, but
if debugfs is preferred I can move it there. It seems strange though to
just have this knob in debugfs and the rest in sysctl under
CONFIG_SCHED_DEBUG.
Thanks,
Kevin
prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-06-19 20:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-06-18 23:58 [PATCH 1/2] sched/nohz: add sysctl control over sched_tick_max_deferment Kevin Hilman
2013-06-18 23:58 ` [PATCH 2/2] sched/nohz: fix overflow error in scheduler_tick_max_deferment() Kevin Hilman
2013-06-19 19:06 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2013-06-19 18:42 ` [PATCH 1/2] sched/nohz: add sysctl control over sched_tick_max_deferment Frederic Weisbecker
2013-06-19 20:34 ` Kevin Hilman [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87ehbx6drk.fsf@linaro.org \
--to=khilman@linaro.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=clark.williams@gmail.com \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=riel@redhat.com \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.