From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:47731) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UeJFS-0001EW-4l for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 20 May 2013 02:07:07 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UeJFP-0003P3-EU for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 20 May 2013 02:07:06 -0400 Received: from e23smtp05.au.ibm.com ([202.81.31.147]:42185) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UeJFO-0003OK-SB for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 20 May 2013 02:07:03 -0400 Received: from /spool/local by e23smtp05.au.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Mon, 20 May 2013 16:01:29 +1000 From: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" In-Reply-To: <5198F982.7060208@msgid.tls.msk.ru> References: <512EEF75.2090503@msgid.tls.msk.ru> <87mwuo4x9o.fsf@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <5198F982.7060208@msgid.tls.msk.ru> Date: Mon, 20 May 2013 11:36:50 +0530 Message-ID: <87ehd25gn9.fsf@linux.vnet.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] 9pfs segfaults on chmod(special) List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Michael Tokarev , Anthony Liguori , qemu-stable Cc: qemu-devel Michael Tokarev writes: > Guys, are we playing with our sand-box toys or what? > > Can we apply this maybe to 1.5?? It's just insane that > such a simple bugfixes, with lots of preceeding work to > identify it, and with users suffering, are being simply > ignored for months... > Sorry for not looking at this before. I wanted to make sure that we are not missing the extension information as part of protocol. Verified that chmod should not carry the extension details. I have sent the patch and also added qemu-stable. -aneesh