From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Chris Ball Subject: Re: [PATCH] mmc: omap_hsmmc: support deferred probing for GPIOs Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2013 11:52:16 -0400 Message-ID: <87ehf7qvnz.fsf@octavius.laptop.org> References: <1359536837-14874-1-git-send-email-jlu@pengutronix.de> <1360838617.3892.27.camel@coredoba.hi.pengutronix.de> <511CEC76.9020703@ti.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: Received: from void.printf.net ([89.145.121.20]:44576 "EHLO void.printf.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S933488Ab3CVPwX convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Fri, 22 Mar 2013 11:52:23 -0400 In-Reply-To: <511CEC76.9020703@ti.com> (Balaji T. K.'s message of "Thu, 14 Feb 2013 19:23:58 +0530") Sender: linux-mmc-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org To: Balaji T K Cc: Jan =?utf-8?Q?L=C3=BCbbe?= , linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org Hi, On Thu, Feb 14 2013, Balaji T K wrote: > On Thursday 14 February 2013 04:13 PM, Jan L=C3=BCbbe wrote: >> On Wed, 2013-01-30 at 10:07 +0100, Jan Luebbe wrote: >>> If the CD/WP-GPIOs are not provided by the SoC's GPIO controller, >>> we need to handle the case where omap_hsmmc is probed earlier than >>> the GPIO controller chosen in the device tree. >>> >>> Fix this by checking the return value of of_get_named_gpio against >>> -EPROBE_DEFER and passing it through to the probe function. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Jan Luebbe >> >> Balaji, since you seem to be the new OMAP HSMMC maintainer, do you h= ave >> any comments on this patch? > > Looks good to me, > Acked-by: Balaji T K Thanks, pushed to mmc-next for 3.10. - Chris. --=20 Chris Ball One Laptop Per Child