From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Chris Ball Subject: Re: [PATCH] mmc: at91-mci: remove driver Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2012 11:09:13 -0400 Message-ID: <87ehkgov3a.fsf@octavius.laptop.org> References: <1351520875-31891-1-git-send-email-ludovic.desroches@atmel.com> <87625txrou.fsf@octavius.laptop.org> <20121030150113.GB19021@game.jcrosoft.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from void.printf.net ([89.145.121.20]:35078 "EHLO void.printf.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S933792Ab2J3PJY (ORCPT ); Tue, 30 Oct 2012 11:09:24 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20121030150113.GB19021@game.jcrosoft.org> (Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD's message of "Tue, 30 Oct 2012 16:01:13 +0100") Sender: linux-mmc-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org To: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD Cc: ludovic.desroches@atmel.com, linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, nicolas.ferre@atmel.com Hi, On Tue, Oct 30 2012, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote: >> Thanks! Pushed to mmc-next for 3.8. > > if you don't mind I prefer to take it via at91 > > I've a patch series that cleanup the platform_data it's difficult to merge > with this one Hm, I don't understand why it should be difficult to merge. Is it because this patch modifies arch/arm/mach-at91/include/mach/board.h? If so, sounds like we should just take that change out of this patch and have it go into your platform data cleanup patch, and then I can merge the drivers/mmc change independently? Let me know what you think. Thanks, - Chris. -- Chris Ball One Laptop Per Child From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: cjb@laptop.org (Chris Ball) Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2012 11:09:13 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] mmc: at91-mci: remove driver In-Reply-To: <20121030150113.GB19021@game.jcrosoft.org> (Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD's message of "Tue, 30 Oct 2012 16:01:13 +0100") References: <1351520875-31891-1-git-send-email-ludovic.desroches@atmel.com> <87625txrou.fsf@octavius.laptop.org> <20121030150113.GB19021@game.jcrosoft.org> Message-ID: <87ehkgov3a.fsf@octavius.laptop.org> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Hi, On Tue, Oct 30 2012, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote: >> Thanks! Pushed to mmc-next for 3.8. > > if you don't mind I prefer to take it via at91 > > I've a patch series that cleanup the platform_data it's difficult to merge > with this one Hm, I don't understand why it should be difficult to merge. Is it because this patch modifies arch/arm/mach-at91/include/mach/board.h? If so, sounds like we should just take that change out of this patch and have it go into your platform data cleanup patch, and then I can merge the drivers/mmc change independently? Let me know what you think. Thanks, - Chris. -- Chris Ball One Laptop Per Child