From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andi Kleen Subject: Re: Hardware Error Kernel Mini-Summit Date: Tue, 18 May 2010 20:45:29 +0200 Message-ID: <87eih9xd4m.fsf@basil.nowhere.org> References: <4BF18995.6070008@redhat.com> <4BF2392A.9040409@jp.fujitsu.com> <4BF2C3D1.10009@redhat.com> <1274204560.17703.82.camel@Joe-Laptop.home> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1274204560.17703.82.camel@Joe-Laptop.home> (Joe Perches's message of "Tue\, 18 May 2010 10\:42\:40 -0700") Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Joe Perches Cc: Mauro Carvalho Chehab , Hidetoshi Seto , Linux Kernel Mailing List , bluesmoke-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, Linux Edac Mailing List , Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , Ben Woodard , Matt Domsch , Doug Thompson , Borislav Petkov , Tony Luck , Brent Young List-Id: edac.vger.kernel.org Joe Perches writes: > On Tue, 2010-05-18 at 13:44 -0300, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: >> IMO, the first >> step is to provide an error core integrated to perf, and then start >> integrating the several error systems around it. > > Why integrated to perf? For a different perspective on this see also http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/952061 AFAIK all the issues mentioned there are still open. -Andi -- ak@linux.intel.com -- Speaking for myself only.