From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Kevin Hilman Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] omap: pm34xx: Enable IO / IO-CHAIN wakeups for PER Date: Tue, 04 May 2010 12:06:37 -0700 Message-ID: <87eihrh4g2.fsf@deeprootsystems.com> References: <1272927847-21226-1-git-send-email-mike@android.com> <87tyqor237.fsf@deeprootsystems.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mail-pz0-f186.google.com ([209.85.222.186]:38205 "EHLO mail-pz0-f186.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932121Ab0EDTGm (ORCPT ); Tue, 4 May 2010 15:06:42 -0400 Received: by pzk16 with SMTP id 16so2073349pzk.22 for ; Tue, 04 May 2010 12:06:40 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: (Mike Chan's message of "Mon\, 3 May 2010 16\:48\:21 -0700") Sender: linux-omap-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org To: Mike Chan Cc: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, r-woodruff2@ti.com, tony@atomide.com Mike Chan writes: > On Mon, May 3, 2010 at 4:35 PM, Kevin Hilman > wrote: >> Mike Chan writes: >> >>> IO events can also come from GPIO modules, which reside in the PER domain. >>> It is possible for the PER to enter RET while CORE is still in ON. >>> If GPIO 2-6 are enabled for IO-pad wakeups, the PER domain will not >>> wakeup in this case, unless we enable it. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Mike Chan >> >> Thanks, adding both patches to PM branch (pm-fixes branch) and will >> queue for 2.6.35. >> > > Thanks, with this patch looking good, I was hoping for some feedback > from people on the 2nd patch in the series. It makes sense to me since > PER will be woken up now, not just CORE, but I wanted to double check. It makes sense to me too, I've applied both to the pm-fixes branch. Kevin