From: Kevin Hilman <khilman@deeprootsystems.com>
To: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>
Cc: linux-omap <linux-omap@vger.kernel.org>,
Benoit Cousson <b-cousson@ti.com>,
Madhusudhan Chikkature Rajashekar <madhu.cr@ti.com>,
Paul Walmsley <paul@pwsan.com>, Romit Dasgupta <romit@ti.com>,
Sanjeev Premi <premi@ti.com>,
Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com>,
Sergio Alberto Aguirre Rodriguez <saaguirre@ti.com>,
Thara Gopinath <thara@ti.com>,
Vishwanath Sripathy <vishwanath.bs@ti.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/9] omap3: pm: sr: replace get_opp with freq_to_opp
Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2009 15:12:49 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87eimrx4em.fsf@deeprootsystems.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1258004721-7315-6-git-send-email-nm@ti.com> (Nishanth Menon's message of "Wed\, 11 Nov 2009 23\:45\:17 -0600")
Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com> writes:
> SmartReflex implements a get_opp to search through the opp table,
> replace it with the accessor function as it is a duplicate of
> freq_to_opp
SmartReflex is not quite working with this version which is in
pm-wip-opp. My (untested) theory below...
[...]
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/smartreflex.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/smartreflex.c
> @@ -146,49 +146,29 @@ static u32 cal_test_nvalue(u32 sennval, u32 senpval)
> (rnsenn << NVALUERECIPROCAL_RNSENN_SHIFT);
> }
>
> -/* determine the current OPP from the frequency
> - * we need to give this function last element of OPP rate table
> - * and the frequency
> - */
> -static u16 get_opp(struct omap_opp *opp_freq_table,
> - unsigned long freq)
> -{
> - struct omap_opp *prcm_config;
> -
> - prcm_config = opp_freq_table;
> -
> - if (prcm_config->rate <= freq)
> - return prcm_config->opp_id; /* Return the Highest OPP */
> - for (; prcm_config->rate; prcm_config--)
> - if (prcm_config->rate < freq)
> - return (prcm_config+1)->opp_id;
> - else if (prcm_config->rate == freq)
> - return prcm_config->opp_id;
> - /* Return the least OPP */
> - return (prcm_config+1)->opp_id;
> -}
The function you removed here is doing the equivalent of
opp_find_freq_ceil()
> -static u16 get_vdd1_opp(void)
> +static u8 get_vdd1_opp(void)
> {
> - u16 opp;
> + u8 opp;
>
> if (sr1.vdd_opp_clk == NULL || IS_ERR(sr1.vdd_opp_clk) ||
> mpu_opps == NULL)
> return 0;
>
> - opp = get_opp(mpu_opps + MAX_VDD1_OPP, sr1.vdd_opp_clk->rate);
> + /* Not expected to fail.. */
> + BUG_ON(freq_to_opp(&opp, mpu_opps, sr1.vdd_opp_clk->rate));
> return opp;
> }
Ih this version you use freq_to_opp(), but in the V5 tarball you sent,
you replace get_opp with:
opp = opp_find_freq_exact(mpu_opps, sr1.vdd_opp_clk->rate, true);
This results in never finding an OPP, and SR never scaling.
This should probably be opp_find_freq_ceil(), right?
Kevin
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-12-18 23:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-11-12 5:45 [PATCH 0/9] OMAP3: PM: introduce support for 3630 OPPs Nishanth Menon
2009-11-12 5:45 ` [PATCH 1/9] omap3: pm: introduce enabled flag to omap_opp Nishanth Menon
2009-11-12 5:45 ` [PATCH 2/9] omap3: pm: introduce opp accessor functions Nishanth Menon
2009-11-12 5:45 ` [PATCH 3/9] omap3: pm: srf: introduce accessor function Nishanth Menon
2009-11-12 5:45 ` [PATCH 4/9] omap3: pm: use opp accessor functions for omap-target Nishanth Menon
2009-11-12 5:45 ` [PATCH 5/9] omap3: pm: sr: replace get_opp with freq_to_opp Nishanth Menon
2009-11-12 5:45 ` [PATCH 6/9] omap3: clk: use pm accessor functions for cpufreq table Nishanth Menon
2009-11-12 5:45 ` [PATCH 7/9] omap3: pm: remove VDDx_MIN/MAX macros Nishanth Menon
2009-11-12 5:45 ` [PATCH 8/9] omap3: pm: introduce dynamic OPP Nishanth Menon
2009-11-12 5:45 ` [PATCH 9/9] omap3: pm: introduce 3630 opps Nishanth Menon
2009-12-18 23:12 ` Kevin Hilman [this message]
2009-12-19 11:35 ` [PATCH 5/9] omap3: pm: sr: replace get_opp with freq_to_opp Menon, Nishanth
2009-12-22 16:45 ` Kevin Hilman
2010-01-06 23:46 ` Nishanth Menon
2010-01-07 0:23 ` Kevin Hilman
2010-01-07 8:35 ` Sripathy, Vishwanath
2010-01-07 8:53 ` Romit Dasgupta
2010-01-07 9:13 ` Sripathy, Vishwanath
2010-01-07 12:15 ` Nishanth Menon
2010-01-07 14:18 ` Nishanth Menon
2009-12-21 6:58 ` Romit Dasgupta
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2009-11-13 6:05 [PATCH 0/9 v2] omap3: pm: introduce support for 3630 OPPs Nishanth Menon
2009-11-13 6:05 ` [PATCH 1/9] omap3: pm: introduce enabled flag to omap_opp Nishanth Menon
2009-11-13 6:05 ` [PATCH 2/9 v2] omap3: pm: introduce opp accessor functions Nishanth Menon
2009-11-13 6:05 ` [PATCH 3/9] omap3: pm: srf: use opp accessor function Nishanth Menon
2009-11-13 6:05 ` [PATCH 4/9] omap3: pm: use opp accessor functions for omap-target Nishanth Menon
2009-11-13 6:05 ` [PATCH 5/9] omap3: pm: sr: replace get_opp with freq_to_opp Nishanth Menon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87eimrx4em.fsf@deeprootsystems.com \
--to=khilman@deeprootsystems.com \
--cc=b-cousson@ti.com \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=madhu.cr@ti.com \
--cc=nm@ti.com \
--cc=paul@pwsan.com \
--cc=premi@ti.com \
--cc=romit@ti.com \
--cc=saaguirre@ti.com \
--cc=santosh.shilimkar@ti.com \
--cc=thara@ti.com \
--cc=vishwanath.bs@ti.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.