From: Nix <nix@esperi.org.uk>
To: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc: Avuton Olrich <avuton@gmail.com>, lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Kernel panic: Machine check exception
Date: Sat, 19 Nov 2005 22:24:17 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87ek5ce0oe.fsf@amaterasu.srvr.nix> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1132436886.19692.17.camel@localhost.localdomain> (Alan Cox's message of "19 Nov 2005 21:16:21 -0000")
On 19 Nov 2005, Alan Cox stipulated:
> On Sad, 2005-11-19 at 12:54 -0800, Avuton Olrich wrote:
>> Is there a good way to narrow it down? I guess running a badmem
>> program would be good to start with, otherwise ...(?).
>
> A memory test may be worth doing but most machine checks indicate the
> fault is more serious than bad memory.
Some of them are certainly not very serious in their effects. I get this
persistently, once every couple of months, on one of my machines (an
Athlon 4 with 768Mb of ECC RAM):
kernel: MCE: The hardware reports a non fatal, correctable incident occurred on CPU 0.
kernel: Bank 2: 940040000000017a
and I think it *is* a single slightly wobbly bit (the wobble being too
slight for memtest to find).
Nothing discernible has ever gone wrong as a result of that, right down
to repeated GCC enable-checking bootstrap-and-tests completing without
error (well, without any more than the expected XFAILs).
(I'm just *assuming* the `Bank 2' in this message refers to a bank of
RAM. Doubtless this assumption will now be shown to be utterly wrong and
a sign of terminal foolishness on my part... ;) )
--
`Y'know, London's nice at this time of year. If you like your cities
freezing cold and full of surly gits.' --- David Damerell
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-11-19 22:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-11-19 9:45 Kernel panic: Machine check exception Avuton Olrich
2005-11-19 9:55 ` Avuton Olrich
2005-11-19 10:02 ` Arjan van de Ven
2005-11-19 10:04 ` Avuton Olrich
2005-11-19 13:24 ` Alan Cox
2005-11-19 20:54 ` Avuton Olrich
2005-11-19 21:48 ` Alan Cox
2005-11-19 22:24 ` Nix [this message]
2005-12-06 11:13 ` Eric W. Biederman
2005-12-06 13:23 ` Avuton Olrich
2005-12-06 19:45 ` Andi Kleen
2005-12-06 18:45 ` Avuton Olrich
2005-12-06 18:47 ` Andi Kleen
2005-12-08 2:46 ` Avuton Olrich
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87ek5ce0oe.fsf@amaterasu.srvr.nix \
--to=nix@esperi.org.uk \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=avuton@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.