From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Greg Freemyer Subject: Re: mirroring: [patch 1 of 8] device failure tolerance Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2005 11:13:17 -0400 Message-ID: <87f94c37050630081370347a28@mail.gmail.com> References: <16a7b346170f3909d57592016a32abc0@redhat.com> Reply-To: Greg Freemyer , device-mapper development Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: In-Reply-To: <16a7b346170f3909d57592016a32abc0@redhat.com> Content-Disposition: inline List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: dm-devel-bounces@redhat.com Errors-To: dm-devel-bounces@redhat.com To: device-mapper development Cc: Kergon Alasdair List-Id: dm-devel.ids On 6/29/05, Jonathan E Brassow wrote: > This patch defines a couple more states that logs can return, and > checks for those states in the mirror code. The states are useful for > logs that have cluster support. >=20 > brassow Have I been asleep? This is the first I heard of DM having cluster mirror support. I assume the goal is something along the lines of what DRBD provides. Can someone give a very high-level overview of current status, plans, etc. related to DM Cluster Mirror support. And if this related to the DRBD project? Thanks Greg --=20 Greg Freemyer The Norcross Group Forensics for the 21st Century