From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists1p.gnu.org (lists1p.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-ECDSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2BDDD606A31C for ; Fri, 13 Nov 2026 07:55:12 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=V69Ng+0L Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists1p.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1xRm7f-0006uW-D3; Fri, 13 Nov 2026 02:54:59 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists1p.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1xRm7P-0006YW-Gc for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 13 Nov 2026 02:54:45 -0500 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com ([170.10.129.124]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1xRm7O-0003qy-3Q for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 13 Nov 2026 02:54:43 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1794556478; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=pIJ6prZkofVbPctfvleN1d0VHlFM62tgLzvBjl47u5k=; b=V69Ng+0LZwG/1yZzmbIsiquNLYRjSM3mxsJMc8quMlpyBfRHFoGef5ON7E0tlgkpP1mjwz XJ3Ra3k+ZL1mnb1dmmrCZK0N1a7p8US20x1m9sfg5v54LNH4KHpl5EcDK2iYUNV5JUCVSE 4oMr6FKGn/IP1w5W2zFJHRMDnHR/kvw= Received: from mx-prod-mc-03.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (ec2-54-186-198-63.us-west-2.compute.amazonaws.com [54.186.198.63]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-389-WDDncS3aO32WAlk-JRqZgg-1; Fri, 13 Nov 2026 02:54:03 -0500 X-MC-Unique: WDDncS3aO32WAlk-JRqZgg-1 X-Mimecast-MFC-AGG-ID: WDDncS3aO32WAlk-JRqZgg_1794556441 Received: from mx-prod-int-10.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (mx-prod-int-10.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com [10.30.177.95]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mx-prod-mc-03.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 21A8D1956055; Fri, 13 Nov 2026 07:54:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from blackfin.pond.sub.org (unknown [10.44.22.7]) by mx-prod-int-10.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ABEE2421; Fri, 13 Nov 2026 07:54:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: by blackfin.pond.sub.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 6138421E6A04; Fri, 13 Nov 2026 08:53:58 +0100 (CET) From: Markus Armbruster To: Daniel P. =?utf-8?Q?Berrang=C3=A9?= Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Philippe =?utf-8?Q?Mathieu-Daud=C3=A9?= , Pierrick Bouvier , Yonggang Luo Subject: Re: [PATCH 35/48] qapi: report target compatibility for machine types In-Reply-To: <20261112133054.1977618-36-berrange@redhat.com> ("Daniel P. =?utf-8?Q?Berrang=C3=A9=22's?= message of "Thu, 12 Nov 2026 13:30:41 +0000") References: <20261112133054.1977618-1-berrange@redhat.com> <20261112133054.1977618-36-berrange@redhat.com> Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2026 08:53:58 +0100 Message-ID: <87fqx5xj3d.fsf@pond.sub.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) X-Archived-By: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 3.6 on 10.30.177.95 Received-SPF: pass client-ip=170.10.129.124; envelope-from=armbru@redhat.com; helo=us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com X-Spam_score_int: 5 X-Spam_score: 0.5 X-Spam_bar: / X-Spam_report: (0.5 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H5=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, RCVD_IN_SBL_CSS=3.335, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: qemu development List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=-12.3 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS, USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=4.0.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.1 (2024-03-26) on aws-us-west-2-korg-listserv-alma10-1 Daniel P. Berrang=C3=A9 writes: > Add a 'targets' field to MachineInfo which is populated with > the list of targets a machine is declard to be compatible > with. > > To avoid reporting redundant information for the traditional > per-target emulator binaries, this new field is only emitted > if no target is currently selected, or the 'all-targets' > flag is explicitly set. How much redundant data does this save in practice? Is saving it worth the additional interface complexity? > Signed-off-by: Daniel P. Berrang=C3=A9