From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A27A8CD98CF for ; Tue, 16 Jun 2026 09:24:28 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:MIME-Version:Message-ID:Date:References :In-Reply-To:Subject:Cc:To:From:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=1+jyoRrIeORlKXcgJc6/lQjmR6Tt9J69cSCBhrzGAzs=; b=fYjHpjlKIhg9mY Aoe3nedFDZdtfJNEvdMTis+EvhrVtumv8/ZL48T0dwHZqQD44NITMByslc+A1CbyrIZ/hdmYJmBs+ oQ3KRvvPAY3GG80WD68ASHLp7Iw/UoAfnKp3eIIqLUvthXxXRyxM57Gx9r8msmhurJ5GfcrcGMyoC OmsRvGRa4lqCzbgCBgkPuEZ4m5boFHE/GOQutU+lByoym+YbhoSkhHviEIodkSPpZlT3gHJkL5Ptd kFibYONI2ybBzCBdSTFy9TrtblccYA/AlA+WhUUx3qs4DGWiKM2c/rvmPz4yuz91e5EOhZKkGSDn5 jXxeiRIaIH4daBDO4BiQ==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.99.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1wZQ1f-0000000FW13-2qIN; Tue, 16 Jun 2026 09:24:07 +0000 Received: from galois.linutronix.de ([193.142.43.55]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.99.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1wZQ1c-0000000FW00-3KAk for linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org; Tue, 16 Jun 2026 09:24:06 +0000 From: Nam Cao DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020; t=1781601827; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=klUedJpf6maPoF56W1BBX0R6kzss8gV6pnLtqqah3No=; b=yrZrUOE2znH7b2eJWLFrtDi5N/MNVBOmnPnWOWx+kyjhp5QiXWrBRddX6DgxRS+Dctmg1o fO6WIseiBJj3e66T9j1t/Vu5of2GozZN6QLbh9DAapjG7alSurjpKXtikCcUJafMtlLqvv JQidIlc/Tlv5ItDJKxxZKWdZxNNtwxyM0avWPdyTC3x9hG1n7qv/DtBJyjDctTCyqFaKLu eZKe8Dl/kvfaDKuyns34gk0lUhXjEd/jeKDOayPT3x0wBdXjvvs1p/qtCfjQ40zqYFOEik APySUnJfn7ml+6LtsgzG6iwYvlESm3eUA4WBl/XIOrfkMlamKXdlj0VB71SrLg== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020e; t=1781601827; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=klUedJpf6maPoF56W1BBX0R6kzss8gV6pnLtqqah3No=; b=pulydRLMMVTemme4v4exPLgQz61MaMXtbFg82aw4rcz/+1jr08yu9qUV4Ei5qScyWJAd2T x8ol+CJOXbv13GDQ== To: Anirudh Srinivasan Cc: Paul Walmsley , Palmer Dabbelt , Albert Ou , Alexandre Ghiti , Andrew Jones , linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, andrew.jones@oss.qualcomm.com, ganboing@gmail.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] riscv: drop __init from vec_check_unaligned_access_speed_all_cpus In-Reply-To: References: <20260612-vec_unaligned_drop_init-v1-1-df969210ae34@oss.tenstorrent.com> <87ecibwiz6.fsf@yellow.woof> Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2026 11:23:46 +0200 Message-ID: <87fr2mvnx9.fsf@yellow.woof> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.9.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20260616_022404_981184_BE6B2E88 X-CRM114-Status: UNSURE ( 5.24 ) X-CRM114-Notice: Please train this message. X-BeenThere: linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-riscv" Errors-To: linux-riscv-bounces+linux-riscv=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org Anirudh Srinivasan writes: > I think the difference seems too small here to draw any conclusions. So the difference is in the noises. That's good to know, thanks for testing. > This is only a 4 core CPU. The probe is done in parallel, so the number of CPUs won't make any noticeable difference. I will send patches in this direction instead. Thanks, Nam _______________________________________________ linux-riscv mailing list linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from galois.linutronix.de (Galois.linutronix.de [193.142.43.55]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 395F9407574 for ; Tue, 16 Jun 2026 09:23:49 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=193.142.43.55 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1781601830; cv=none; b=q+HbM0KopRh5jr8AMWNnOOxUa4ikqPgymvQ20KIuayhYbDGN6da+1s6Q7ND0STgKgErjCPNY5dwt/ov9jWaoyBPLrUVNb1MdjumVEPpIe5NJxGgyXvF9wgx9r6lplnc11ZXhELqngC8340m45SOgxVlItte/mVE4sVkeupsSNsw= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1781601830; c=relaxed/simple; bh=klUedJpf6maPoF56W1BBX0R6kzss8gV6pnLtqqah3No=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=D4Y1jaGOnCKOBbRLHk76U3MJcVtpMsUHMNKTOaqIgZ5IimvSARpZqlgPQVYTrBs7pq8216YXpJQHBpN2t5xjtT5hgMuVNwbwNmoODYg98AVcOPqtvyxoejS6ajE3PN22gmU42270c55Rx1V52h5LgwuSB86D19fj5s8BuuuXJNQ= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linutronix.de; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linutronix.de; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b=yrZrUOE2; dkim=permerror (0-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b=pulydRLM; arc=none smtp.client-ip=193.142.43.55 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linutronix.de Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linutronix.de Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b="yrZrUOE2"; dkim=permerror (0-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b="pulydRLM" From: Nam Cao DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020; t=1781601827; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=klUedJpf6maPoF56W1BBX0R6kzss8gV6pnLtqqah3No=; b=yrZrUOE2znH7b2eJWLFrtDi5N/MNVBOmnPnWOWx+kyjhp5QiXWrBRddX6DgxRS+Dctmg1o fO6WIseiBJj3e66T9j1t/Vu5of2GozZN6QLbh9DAapjG7alSurjpKXtikCcUJafMtlLqvv JQidIlc/Tlv5ItDJKxxZKWdZxNNtwxyM0avWPdyTC3x9hG1n7qv/DtBJyjDctTCyqFaKLu eZKe8Dl/kvfaDKuyns34gk0lUhXjEd/jeKDOayPT3x0wBdXjvvs1p/qtCfjQ40zqYFOEik APySUnJfn7ml+6LtsgzG6iwYvlESm3eUA4WBl/XIOrfkMlamKXdlj0VB71SrLg== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020e; t=1781601827; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=klUedJpf6maPoF56W1BBX0R6kzss8gV6pnLtqqah3No=; b=pulydRLMMVTemme4v4exPLgQz61MaMXtbFg82aw4rcz/+1jr08yu9qUV4Ei5qScyWJAd2T x8ol+CJOXbv13GDQ== To: Anirudh Srinivasan Cc: Paul Walmsley , Palmer Dabbelt , Albert Ou , Alexandre Ghiti , Andrew Jones , linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, andrew.jones@oss.qualcomm.com, ganboing@gmail.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] riscv: drop __init from vec_check_unaligned_access_speed_all_cpus In-Reply-To: References: <20260612-vec_unaligned_drop_init-v1-1-df969210ae34@oss.tenstorrent.com> <87ecibwiz6.fsf@yellow.woof> Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2026 11:23:46 +0200 Message-ID: <87fr2mvnx9.fsf@yellow.woof> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Anirudh Srinivasan writes: > I think the difference seems too small here to draw any conclusions. So the difference is in the noises. That's good to know, thanks for testing. > This is only a 4 core CPU. The probe is done in parallel, so the number of CPUs won't make any noticeable difference. I will send patches in this direction instead. Thanks, Nam