All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: himanshu.madhani@oracle.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Himanshu Madhani <himanshu.madhani@oracle.com>,
	Jorge Lopez <jorge.jo.lopez@oracle.com>,
	Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>,
	linux-pci@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PCI/THP: Fix hang due to incorrect guard lock
Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2025 23:31:11 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87frf3wx5s.ffs@tglx> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250708222530.1041477-1-himanshu.madhani@oracle.com>

On Tue, Jul 08 2025 at 22:25, himanshu madhani wrote:

> From: Himanshu Madhani <himanshu.madhani@oracle.com>

The subject line is misleading because the problem is not in the THP
code. It's in the PCI/MSI code implementation of the function which is
used by THP.

> Fix system hang due to incorrect mutex lock placement.
>
> following stack trace will be seen on system boot

Please trim down stack traces to the bare minimum which is required to
illustrate your point.

> [  525.664681] task:systemd-shutdow state:D stack:0     pid:1     tgid:1     ppid:0      task_flags:0x400100 flags:0x00004002
> [  525.796878] Call Trace:
> [  525.826116]  <TASK>
> [  525.851195]  __schedule+0x2d1/0x730
> [  525.892917]  schedule+0x27/0x80
> [  525.930478]  schedule_preempt_disabled+0x15/0x30
> [  525.985718]  __mutex_lock.constprop.0+0x4be/0x8a0
> [  526.041993]  msi_domain_get_virq+0xcc/0x110
> [  526.092031]  pci_msix_write_tph_tag+0x3c/0x100
> [  526.145186]  pcie_tph_set_st_entry+0x125/0x1d0
> [  526.198346]  bnxt_irq_affinity_release+0x35/0x50 [bnxt_en]
> [  526.264015]  irq_set_affinity_notifier+0xe0/0x130
> [  526.320291]  bnxt_free_irq+0x6e/0x110 [bnxt_en]
> [  526.374507]  __bnxt_close_nic.isra.0+0x1eb/0x220 [bnxt_en]
> [  526.440175]  bnxt_close+0x3a/0x100 [bnxt_en]
> [  526.491264]  __dev_close_many+0xae/0x220
> [  526.538179]  dev_close_many+0xc2/0x1b0
> [  526.583014]  netif_close+0x9d/0xd0
> [  526.623693]  bnxt_shutdown+0xb1/0xe0 [bnxt_en]
> [  526.676874]  pci_device_shutdown+0x35/0x70
> [  526.725871]  device_shutdown+0x118/0x1a0

You trimmed the interesting information that this is a softlockup and
kept all the gunk below whihc is completely useless.

> [  526.772788]  kernel_restart+0x3a/0x70
> [  526.816588]  __do_sys_reboot+0x150/0x250
> [  526.863504]  do_syscall_64+0x84/0x940
> [  526.907300]  ? __put_user_8+0xd/0x20
> [  526.950059]  ? rseq_ip_fixup+0x90/0x1e0
> [  526.995937]  ? task_mm_cid_work+0x1ad/0x220
> [  527.045971]  ? __rseq_handle_notify_resume+0x35/0x90
> [  527.105367]  ? arch_exit_to_user_mode_prepare.isra.0+0x98/0xb0
> [  527.175166]  ? do_syscall_64+0xba/0x940
> [  527.221040]  ? do_filp_open+0xd7/0x1a0
> [  527.265882]  ? alloc_fd+0xba/0x110
> [  527.306556]  ? do_sys_openat2+0xa4/0xf0
> [  527.352434]  ? __x64_sys_openat+0x54/0xb0
> [  527.400389]  ? arch_exit_to_user_mode_prepare.isra.0+0x9/0xb0
> [  527.469150]  ? do_syscall_64+0xba/0x940
> [  527.515023]  ? do_user_addr_fault+0x221/0x690
> [  527.567141]  ? clear_bhb_loop+0x30/0x80
> [  527.613017]  ? clear_bhb_loop+0x30/0x80
> [  527.658895]  entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e
> [  527.719332] RIP: 0033:0x7fc3ec504777
> [  527.762091] RSP: 002b:00007ffecd62c4f8 EFLAGS: 00000202 ORIG_RAX: 00000000000000a9
> [  527.852685] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: 00007fc3ec504777
> [  527.938085] RDX: 0000000001234567 RSI: 0000000028121969 RDI: 00000000fee1dead
> [  528.023485] RBP: 00007ffecd62c700 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 00007ffecd62b8e0
> [  528.108878] R10: 0000000000000001 R11: 0000000000000202 R12: 00007ffecd62c568
> [  528.194273] R13: 00007ffecd62c548 R14: 00007ffecd62c568 R15: 0000000000000000
> [  528.279672]  </TASK>

See https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/submitting-patches.html#backtraces

> Fixes: d5124a9957b2 ("PCI/MSI: Provide a sane mechanism for TPH")

This fixes tag is correct

> Fixes: 71296eae5887 ("PCI/TPH: Replace the broken MSI-X control word update")

This one not because it's a subsequent problem caused by the above.

> Reported-by: Jorge Lopez <jorge.jo.lopez@oracle.com>
> Suggested-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
> Tested-by: Jorge Lopez <jorge.jo.lopez@oracle.com>
> Signed-off-by: Himanshu Madhani <himanshu.madhani@oracle.com>

Other than that this looks good.

I pick it up tomorrow through the tip irq/urgent branch and fixup the
changelog, so no need to resend.

Thanks,

        tglx

  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-07-10 21:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-07-08 22:25 [PATCH] PCI/THP: Fix hang due to incorrect guard lock himanshu.madhani
2025-07-10 16:47 ` Himanshu Madhani
2025-07-10 21:31 ` Thomas Gleixner [this message]
2025-07-10 21:46 ` [tip: irq/urgent] PCI/MSI: Prevent recursive locking in pci_msix_write_tph_tag() tip-bot2 for Himanshu Madhani

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87frf3wx5s.ffs@tglx \
    --to=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=helgaas@kernel.org \
    --cc=himanshu.madhani@oracle.com \
    --cc=jorge.jo.lopez@oracle.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.